<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>JAMA Pediatrics: Surgical Critical Care Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:52:24 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@archpedi.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@archpedi.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Outcomes After “Benign” Extra-Axial Fluid</title>
      <link>http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=485822</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Harkavy K. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;While the article “Benign” extra-axial fluid in survivors of neonatal intensive care” was interesting from a prognostic perspective, there are several “science” issues that the editorial staff failed to address. First is the use of the word &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;control&lt;/span&gt; for the group without fluid. In no way are they a control population but simply a reference population. The word &lt;span style="font-style:italic;"&gt;control&lt;/span&gt; refers to a population managed in the traditional way without the experimental intervention. The 2 populations were not assigned to each group but happened to turn out that way.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">158</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">10</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1017</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">1017</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/archpedi.158.10.1017-a</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=485822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>