<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/">
  <channel>
    <title>JAMA Pediatrics: Quality of Care Topic Collection</title>
    <link>http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/</link>
    <description>
    </description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 22:45:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Silverchair</generator>
    <managingEditor>editor@archpedi.jamanetwork.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>webmaster@archpedi.jamanetwork.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <title>Application of Business Model Innovation to Enhance Value in Health Care Delivery Application of Business Model Innovation </title>
      <link>http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1669321</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Fieldston E, Terwiesch C, Altschuler S. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;Faced with the need to improve quality, health care enterprises have used principles from highly reliable industries to make tactical progress. As the health care system faces growing challenges to transform itself, we propose business model innovation as a strategic framework for improving the delivery of health care. We believe that this approach will unify the domains of quality (safety, effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, patient centeredness, and equity) with the need to enhance value by emphasizing innovation in a manner not traditionally seen in health care.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">167</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">5</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">409</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">411</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1221</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1669321</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nurse Staffing and NICU Infection Rates Nurse Staffing and NICU Infection Rates </title>
      <link>http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1669323</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Rogowski JA, Staiger D, Patrick T, et al. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Importance&lt;/div&gt;There are substantial shortfalls in nurse staffing in US neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) relative to national guidelines. These are associated with higher rates of nosocomial infections among infants with very low birth weights.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Objective&lt;/div&gt;To study the adequacy of NICU nurse staffing in the United States using national guidelines and analyze its association with infant outcomes.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Design&lt;/div&gt;Retrospective cohort study. Data for 2008 were collected by web survey of staff nurses. Data for 2009 were collected for 4 shifts in 4 calendar quarters (3 in 2009 and 1 in 2010).&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Setting&lt;/div&gt;Sixty-seven US NICUs from the Vermont Oxford Network, a national voluntary network of hospital NICUs.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Participants&lt;/div&gt;All inborn very low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants, with a NICU stay of at least 3 days, discharged from the NICUs in 2008 (n = 5771) and 2009 (n = 5630). All staff-registered nurses with infant assignments.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Exposures&lt;/div&gt;We measured nurse understaffing relative to acuity-based guidelines using 2008 survey data (4046 nurses and 10 394 infant assignments) and data for 4 complete shifts (3645 nurses and 8804 infant assignments) in 2009-2010.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Main Outcomes and Measures&lt;/div&gt;An infection in blood or cerebrospinal fluid culture occurring more than 3 days after birth among VLBW inborn infants. The hypothesis was formulated prior to data collection.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Results&lt;/div&gt;Hospitals understaffed 31% of their NICU infants and 68% of high-acuity infants relative to guidelines. To meet minimum staffing guidelines on average would require an additional 0.11 of a nurse per infant overall and 0.34 of a nurse per high-acuity infant. Very low-birth-weight infant infection rates were 16.4% in 2008 and 13.9% in 2009. A 1 standard deviation–higher understaffing level (SD, 0.11 in 2008 and 0.08 in 2009) was associated with adjusted odds ratios of 1.39 (95% CI, 1.19-1.62; P &lt; .001) in 2008 and 1.40 (95% CI, 1.19-1.65; P &lt; .001) in 2009.&lt;div class="boxTitle"&gt;Conclusions and Relevance&lt;/div&gt;Substantial NICU nurse understaffing relative to national guidelines is widespread. Understaffing is associated with an increased risk for VLBW nosocomial infection. Hospital administrators and NICU managers should assess their staffing decisions to devote needed nursing care to critically ill infants.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">167</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">5</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">444</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">450</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.18</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1669323</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> JAMA Pediatrics  Hospital Medicine Theme Issue  JAMA Pediatrics  Hospital Medicine Theme Issue </title>
      <link>http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1671779</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Keren R, Shah SS. </author>
      <description>&lt;span class="paragraphSection"&gt;The hospital is a site of increasingly complex and resource-intensive care for children. It is also a clinical setting that in recent years has undergone major changes in the organization, delivery, and financing of care, with reduction in resident work hours, requirements for greater attending oversight of trainees, increased scrutiny of clinical outcomes, new payment models that shift financial risk to health care providers, and new delivery models that attempt to provide greater value for money. This issue of JAMA Pediatrics focuses on hospital medicine, highlighting many of the issues that hospitals will face as they adapt to the rapidly changing health care delivery and financing landscape.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <prism:volume xmlns:prism="prism">167</prism:volume>
      <prism:number xmlns:prism="prism">5</prism:number>
      <prism:startingPage xmlns:prism="prism">485</prism:startingPage>
      <prism:endingPage xmlns:prism="prism">487</prism:endingPage>
      <prism:doi xmlns:prism="prism">10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.384</prism:doi>
      <guid>http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleID=1671779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>