0
The Pediatric Forum |

A Stronger Understanding of Magnet-Ingestion Injuries

Ramin Jamshidi, MD; Michael Harrison, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Copyright 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

More Author Information
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(9):900-900. doi:10.1001/archpedi.162.9.900-a
Text Size: A A A
Published online

We read with interest Dutta and Barzin's case report1 regarding complications of multiple magnet ingestion. As the authors concede, similar articles have been published in a variety of medical specialty journals, though almost none comment on or investigate the physical characteristics of the magnets. Reflection on the spectrum of these magnet-ingestion injuries is illuminating. If magnets are swallowed alone, synchronously, or with great separation in time, they are generally innocuous. However, when ingested over some intermediate interval, magnets cause injury because they are in different parts of the gastrointestinal tract when they attract one another. Such transluminal attraction between weaker magnets may create local ulceration or abscesses from slow, contained pressure necrosis. Stronger transluminal attraction can cause severe ischemia and/or lacerating/shearing trauma, which leads to free perforation. Therefore, some children sustain immediate injuries with intestinal perforation, while others develop subacute symptoms culminating in abscesses or fistulae, but the factors that determine which outcome will occur are poorly understood.

Unfortunately, reports of magnet ingestion injury have failed to describe the physical properties of the offending magnets (ie, surface fields and attraction force). This limits the insight that can be gleaned regarding the underlying biology of compression injury. Through physical modeling and experimental animal work, we have demonstrated that the critical components that determine outcomes are the topology of the compressing surfaces and the magnitude of the magnetic fields. In fact, remodeling by compression can be harnessed to safely form intentional anastomoses, a process that we have demonstrated in pigs. The medical community could learn more from these unfortunate experiments of ingestion with more information about the specific properties of the offending magnets. We solicit physicians caring for such patients to submit the retrieved magnets to our laboratory for physical characterization and testing (for which we have institutional review board approval). Correlation with the associated clinical history, photographs, and tissue would further facilitate evaluation.

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Correspondence: Dr Jamshidi, Department of Surgery, University of California–San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, Health Sciences West 1601, San Francisco, CA 94143-0570 (ramin.jamshidi@ucsf.edu).

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Jamshidi and Harrison. Acquisition of data: Jamshidi. Analysis and interpretation of data: Jamshidi. Drafting of the manuscript: Jamshidi. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Jamshidi and Harrison. Obtained funding: Harrison. Study supervision: Harrison.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Dutta  S, Barzin  A. Multiple magnet ingestion as a source of severe gastrointestinal complications requiring surgical intervention. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008;162 (2) 123- 125
PubMed

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Dutta  S, Barzin  A. Multiple magnet ingestion as a source of severe gastrointestinal complications requiring surgical intervention. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008;162 (2) 123- 125
PubMed

Correspondence

CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics