0
The Pediatric Forum |

Pediatric Referral Patterns

Horst D. Weinberg, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Not Available


Copyright 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

More Author Information
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(10):1033-1033. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.10.1033-a
Text Size: A A A
Published online

The article by Forrest et al,1 and the commentary by Ferris,2 do not mention the main reason for the disparity in subspecialty consultations. The reason is a shift in the training philosophy of the pediatric resident. Years ago, pediatric house officers were taught: "You will be a specialist in the care of children." Today's pediatric resident, however, receives a different, double message: "You will be a specialist in the care of children but you will not be good enough to care for complex problems in infectious disease, neurology, cardiology, gastroenterology, developmental medicine, and so on. Complicated (interesting) patients must be referred for diagnosis and care to the pertinent subspecialist."

This mantra does little for the self-image of the general pediatric resident. Ask today's house officer for a treatment plan for a child with any complicated problem, and the response is: "We need a (subspecialty) consult." This philosophy carries over into the practice years, leading the pediatrician to assume the function of a triage physician for children. This is the real reason for the many subspecialty consults in the United States.

What is the reason for the change in philosophy? Years ago, there were few pediatric subspecialists, and because of their patient load, they trained pediatric residents to handle the everyday, "bread and butter" problems in their subspecialty. This did wonders for the future pediatrician's self-assuredness. Now, the plethora of pediatric subspecialists cannot survive financially without referrals, so there is less incentive for subspecialist teachers to train house officers in the skills necessary to handle the common problems in their specialty.

This is also the reason for the change in what pediatricians actually do. Pediatricians once attended cesarean sections and complicated deliveries. They hospitalized and treated their own patients, saw after-hours emergencies, and took care of all of their patients' medical needs from birth through adolescence. The pediatrician was involved. The pediatrician was needed. Many of today's pediatricians prefer not to attend cesarean section births and do not want to nor do they feel competent to handle the hospitalized patient. Consequently, the pediatrician has given up the care of the cases that make pediatrics so fascinating and satisfying. It is just "simpler" to refer the patient.

There is no question, many complicated pediatric patients do need subspecialty referral and care. However, certainly, pediatricians in the United States and the United Kingdom, should be able to take care of most of the more complicated patients without a subspecialty referral.

REFERENCES

Forrest  CB, Majeed  A, Weiner  JP, Carroll  K, Bindman  AB. Referral of children to specialists in the United States and the United Kingdom. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157279- 285
Ferris  TG. Primary care and specialty care for US children: what is the right mix? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157219- 220

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Forrest  CB, Majeed  A, Weiner  JP, Carroll  K, Bindman  AB. Referral of children to specialists in the United States and the United Kingdom. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157279- 285
Ferris  TG. Primary care and specialty care for US children: what is the right mix? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157219- 220

Correspondence

CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles