0
The Pediatric Forum |

Peak Flow Meter Use Is Not Where Emphasis Should Be Placed

Richard J. Scarfone, MD; Joseph J. Zorc, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Not Available


Copyright 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

More Author Information
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(9):946-946. doi:
Text Size: A A A
Published online

In reply

We agree with Dr Weinberger that symptom monitoring is an important component of patient self-assessment. Our article did not state or imply that self-monitoring by using a peak flow meter is superior to other forms of monitoring. Rather, we recognize it as one of several ways in which an older asthmatic child may assess the severity of an asthma exacerbation. As we reported in our article, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute encourages patients to establish their personal best peak expiratory flow (PEF) and use it as the basis of their asthma action plan, stating that "short-term daily peak flow monitoring is helpful for assessing the severity of a patient's asthma."1

Most of the studies assessing the utility of peak flow monitoring have been performed in adults. In one trial, patients asked to monitor PEF twice per day had lower symptom scores and less use of maintenance therapy compared with a control group.2 Ignaio-Garcia and Gonzalez-Santos3 compared patients who used PEF readings as the basis for intensifying asthma therapy with those who used symptom monitoring. After 6 months, patients in the experimental group had significant improvements in days lost from work, number of exacerbations, days receiving antibiotic therapy, nocturnal awakening, emergency visits, and admissions, while the control group exhibited more modest benefits. Similarly, Lahdensuo et al4 reported that patients who were allowed to adjust their medications based on daily PEF readings had fewer unscheduled medical visits, fewer missed days of work, and higher quality-of-life scores compared with those without peak flow meters who could not make medication changes on their own.

Although more data in children are needed, we believe that clinicians should prescribe peak flow meters and teach their proper use, and we recommend them as an important component of a self-management plan. We stand by our article's conclusion that the underprescribing of peak flow meters, their underutilization, and a lack of knowledge regarding score interpretation limits their potential efficacy in asthma self-management.

REFERENCES

Murphy  S. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma.  Bethesda, Md National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute1997;Report 97- 4051
Woolcock  AJ, Yan  K, Salome  CM. Effect of therapy on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the long-term management of asthma. Clin Allergy. 1988;18165- 176
Ignacio-Garcia  JM, Gonzalez-Santos  P. Asthma self-management education program by home monitoring of peak expiratory flow. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151353- 359
Lahdensuo  A, Haahtela  T, Herrala  J.  et al.  Randomized comparison of guided self-management and traditional treatment of asthma over 1 year. BMJ. 1996;312748- 752

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Murphy  S. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma.  Bethesda, Md National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute1997;Report 97- 4051
Woolcock  AJ, Yan  K, Salome  CM. Effect of therapy on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the long-term management of asthma. Clin Allergy. 1988;18165- 176
Ignacio-Garcia  JM, Gonzalez-Santos  P. Asthma self-management education program by home monitoring of peak expiratory flow. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151353- 359
Lahdensuo  A, Haahtela  T, Herrala  J.  et al.  Randomized comparison of guided self-management and traditional treatment of asthma over 1 year. BMJ. 1996;312748- 752

Correspondence

CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles