0
Editorial |

Pediatric Palliative Care: Title and subTitle BreakThe Time Has Come

Nancy Hutton, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Not Available


Copyright 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

More Author Information
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(1):9-10. doi:10.1001/archpedi.156.1.9
Text Size: A A A
Published online

WE ARE RIDING on the crest of miraculous advances in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases and debilitating conditions. Pediatric health care providers are caught up in the wider culture of the expectation that with enough research, testing, and treatment, we should be able to effectively cure or control the health problems of the children for whom we care. Even for diagnoses known to be life limiting, the assumed goal of medical care remains curative in intent. This expectation, and our determination as health care professionals to provide the best care for our patients, has led unintentionally to our denial that death is in fact the ultimate outcome for many. Superspecialized tertiary and quaternary care often blinds us from noticing that, sometimes, the child for whom we care is dying. This sacred moment can be swept away in the undertow of high technology. Contro et al1 help us regain our footing with their report directly from the parents of our patients. They elegantly describe the needs of dying children and their families, offering us the voices of the families themselves.

Their observations and conclusions touch on the full continuum of care, from diagnosis through death and bereavement; across care venues from hospital, to outpatient office, to home. Communication between staff and families was a key component. It played a critical role in health care decision making. Parents wanted to be actively involved in making decisions about their child's care. They valued honesty, accuracy, clarity, and compassion in their providers. They were distressed by insensitivity or feeling patronized or disregarded. Non–English-speaking families reported that language differences created impenetrable barriers to communication with providers. The researchers were struck by the profound and lasting distress caused by even a single event of painful interaction with staff. These findings confirm those of Wharton et al2 and Wolfe et al,3 underscoring the need for training and accountability for all pediatric health care professionals in communicating compassionately and effectively with all families in all settings.4 7

Contro and colleagues demonstrate the importance of asking about the needs of our patients and families.1 Simple open-ended questions are good conversation starters, but they may not reveal the depth or detail of the care needed without prompting for elaboration. For instance, the methodological limitations of simply asking patients or families to rate their satisfaction with pain management are confirmed in this study. Parents responded that they were satisfied with the pain care, yet they reported that their children had unrelieved pain. A troubling explanation for this apparent discordance is that families may not expect that the pain can be controlled. If this is true, then they may not share this or other unmet needs with the health care team. Similarly, they may not articulate the values and beliefs that underlie their decisions without the opportunity to explore them safely and with respect.8 9

Parents whose children died at home reported inadequate home and community-based care at the end of life. Problems ranged from inadequate staffing to agencies admitting they were unprepared to serve children, especially in managing pain. Parents felt they could no longer access services that were available to their children as inpatients because they were now outpatients. Clearly, we need an integrated model of care with pediatric expertise that is flexible and responsive to the child and family across all care venues. The American Academy of Pediatrics6 supports this approach, stating that pediatric palliative care should ensure a seamless transition between care settings, maintain provider continuity, and provide the support of an interdisciplinary team with pediatric palliative care expertise.

Concern exists about how to conduct research with dying patients and bereaved families in a rigorous yet respectful way. The bereaved parents in this study were quite willing to speak to the interviewers; in fact, they were grateful for being asked for their recommendations. We already know the importance of following up with bereaved families after the death of a loved one. The researchers' experiences show us that, far from harming bereaved families, being in touch with them after their child's death and listening to their stories with the intent of gaining new knowledge and improving care provides a measure of healing.

It is sobering to consider that the families who participated in this study are probably those who had the best experiences. The participants were predominantly well-educated parents from the same cultural group as the medical providers. Most of the children had a cancer illness that lasted less than 5 years. This is not a representative sample of all families who lose a child. It is likely to be a sample of families with greater resources for navigating a health care system that includes disease-specific support programs. Their tales of distressing care and unmet needs therefore take on added importance if we assume that those families whose stories were not told had even more difficult experiences.

We need more and better information about the range of experiences for children with chronic life-limiting diagnoses, for other family constellations such as grandparent-led families, and for other racial and ethnic groups. Important work must be done in the following areas:

  1. Pain and symptom management, including the incidence and prevalence of pain and other distressing symptoms in children across diagnoses, prognoses, and age groups, and the testing of effective interventions.

  2. Prognostication across diagnosis and age groups, including predictors of fatal outcome.

  3. Designing effective health care systems across care venues that integrate palliative and curative care from the time of diagnosis.

  4. Health care costs and reimbursement strategies for this integrated care.

  5. Cross-cultural issues affecting palliative and end of life care.

  6. Professional training and support, including content, effective methods, and relevant outcomes.

According to the World Health Organization,10 palliative care affirms life through the active total care of patients whose disease is not responsive to curative treatment. It neither hastens nor postpones death. Its goal is to achieve the best quality of life for patients and their families during illness and bereavement. Contro and colleagues demonstrate that we are far from reaching this goal in pediatrics.1 We must use our current knowledge and resources creatively to immediately assure a basic level of quality care while marshaling the research and planning efforts necessary to make this care the best possible. Our children deserve no less.

REFERENCES

Contro  N, Larson  J, Scofield  S, Sourkes  B, Cohen  H. Family perspectives on the quality of pediatric palliative care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;15514- 19
Wharton  RH, Levine  KR, Buka  S, Emanuel  L. Advance care planning for children with special health needs: a survey of parental attitudes. Pediatrics. 1996;97682- 687
Wolfe  J, Klar  N, Grier  HE.  et al.  Understanding of prognosis among parents of children who died of cancer. JAMA. 2000;2842469- 2475
Masera  G, Spinetta  JJ, Jankovic  M.  et al.  Guidelines for assistance to terminally ill children with cancer: a report of the SIOP Working Committee on Psychosocial Issues in Pediatric Oncology. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1999;3244- 48
Sahler  OJ, Frager  G, Levetown  M, Cohn  FG, Lipson  MA. Medical education about end-of-life care in the pediatric setting: principles, challenges, and opportunities. Pediatrics. 2000;105575- 584
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics and Committee on Hospital Care,  Palliative care for children. Pediatrics. 2000;106351- 357
Hilden  JM, Emanuel  EJ, Fairclough  DL.  et al.  Attitudes and practices among pediatric oncologists regarding end-of-life care: results of the 1998 American Society of Clinical Oncology survey. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19205- 212
Doukas  DJ, McCullough  L. The values history. J Fam Pract. 1991;32145- 149
Wissow  LS, Hutton  N, Kass  N. Preliminary study of a "values history" advance directive interview in a pediatric HIV clinic. J Clin Ethics. 2001;12161- 172
Not Available,  Cancer pain relief and palliative care. Report of a WHO Expert Committee Geneva, Switzerland World Health Organization1990;WHO Technical Report Series. Paper No. 804

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Contro  N, Larson  J, Scofield  S, Sourkes  B, Cohen  H. Family perspectives on the quality of pediatric palliative care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;15514- 19
Wharton  RH, Levine  KR, Buka  S, Emanuel  L. Advance care planning for children with special health needs: a survey of parental attitudes. Pediatrics. 1996;97682- 687
Wolfe  J, Klar  N, Grier  HE.  et al.  Understanding of prognosis among parents of children who died of cancer. JAMA. 2000;2842469- 2475
Masera  G, Spinetta  JJ, Jankovic  M.  et al.  Guidelines for assistance to terminally ill children with cancer: a report of the SIOP Working Committee on Psychosocial Issues in Pediatric Oncology. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1999;3244- 48
Sahler  OJ, Frager  G, Levetown  M, Cohn  FG, Lipson  MA. Medical education about end-of-life care in the pediatric setting: principles, challenges, and opportunities. Pediatrics. 2000;105575- 584
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics and Committee on Hospital Care,  Palliative care for children. Pediatrics. 2000;106351- 357
Hilden  JM, Emanuel  EJ, Fairclough  DL.  et al.  Attitudes and practices among pediatric oncologists regarding end-of-life care: results of the 1998 American Society of Clinical Oncology survey. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19205- 212
Doukas  DJ, McCullough  L. The values history. J Fam Pract. 1991;32145- 149
Wissow  LS, Hutton  N, Kass  N. Preliminary study of a "values history" advance directive interview in a pediatric HIV clinic. J Clin Ethics. 2001;12161- 172
Not Available,  Cancer pain relief and palliative care. Report of a WHO Expert Committee Geneva, Switzerland World Health Organization1990;WHO Technical Report Series. Paper No. 804

Correspondence

CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Resolution

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Clinical Scenario