Not Available
Copyright 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
WE ARE RIDING on the crest of miraculous advances in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases and debilitating conditions. Pediatric health care providers are caught up in the wider culture of the expectation that with enough research, testing, and treatment, we should be able to effectively cure or control the health problems of the children for whom we care. Even for diagnoses known to be life limiting, the assumed goal of medical care remains curative in intent. This expectation, and our determination as health care professionals to provide the best care for our patients, has led unintentionally to our denial that death is in fact the ultimate outcome for many. Superspecialized tertiary and quaternary care often blinds us from noticing that, sometimes, the child for whom we care is dying. This sacred moment can be swept away in the undertow of high technology. Contro et al1 help us regain our footing with their report directly from the parents of our patients. They elegantly describe the needs of dying children and their families, offering us the voices of the families themselves.
Their observations and conclusions touch on the full continuum of care, from diagnosis through death and bereavement; across care venues from hospital, to outpatient office, to home. Communication between staff and families was a key component. It played a critical role in health care decision making. Parents wanted to be actively involved in making decisions about their child's care. They valued honesty, accuracy, clarity, and compassion in their providers. They were distressed by insensitivity or feeling patronized or disregarded. Non–English-speaking families reported that language differences created impenetrable barriers to communication with providers. The researchers were struck by the profound and lasting distress caused by even a single event of painful interaction with staff. These findings confirm those of Wharton et al2 and Wolfe et al,3 underscoring the need for training and accountability for all pediatric health care professionals in communicating compassionately and effectively with all families in all settings.4 - 7
Contro and colleagues demonstrate the importance of asking about the needs of our patients and families.1 Simple open-ended questions are good conversation starters, but they may not reveal the depth or detail of the care needed without prompting for elaboration. For instance, the methodological limitations of simply asking patients or families to rate their satisfaction with pain management are confirmed in this study. Parents responded that they were satisfied with the pain care, yet they reported that their children had unrelieved pain. A troubling explanation for this apparent discordance is that families may not expect that the pain can be controlled. If this is true, then they may not share this or other unmet needs with the health care team. Similarly, they may not articulate the values and beliefs that underlie their decisions without the opportunity to explore them safely and with respect.8 - 9
Parents whose children died at home reported inadequate home and community-based care at the end of life. Problems ranged from inadequate staffing to agencies admitting they were unprepared to serve children, especially in managing pain. Parents felt they could no longer access services that were available to their children as inpatients because they were now outpatients. Clearly, we need an integrated model of care with pediatric expertise that is flexible and responsive to the child and family across all care venues. The American Academy of Pediatrics6 supports this approach, stating that pediatric palliative care should ensure a seamless transition between care settings, maintain provider continuity, and provide the support of an interdisciplinary team with pediatric palliative care expertise.
Concern exists about how to conduct research with dying patients and bereaved families in a rigorous yet respectful way. The bereaved parents in this study were quite willing to speak to the interviewers; in fact, they were grateful for being asked for their recommendations. We already know the importance of following up with bereaved families after the death of a loved one. The researchers' experiences show us that, far from harming bereaved families, being in touch with them after their child's death and listening to their stories with the intent of gaining new knowledge and improving care provides a measure of healing.
It is sobering to consider that the families who participated in this study are probably those who had the best experiences. The participants were predominantly well-educated parents from the same cultural group as the medical providers. Most of the children had a cancer illness that lasted less than 5 years. This is not a representative sample of all families who lose a child. It is likely to be a sample of families with greater resources for navigating a health care system that includes disease-specific support programs. Their tales of distressing care and unmet needs therefore take on added importance if we assume that those families whose stories were not told had even more difficult experiences.
We need more and better information about the range of experiences for children with chronic life-limiting diagnoses, for other family constellations such as grandparent-led families, and for other racial and ethnic groups. Important work must be done in the following areas:
Pain and symptom management, including the incidence and prevalence of pain and other distressing symptoms in children across diagnoses, prognoses, and age groups, and the testing of effective interventions.
Prognostication across diagnosis and age groups, including predictors of fatal outcome.
Designing effective health care systems across care venues that integrate palliative and curative care from the time of diagnosis.
Health care costs and reimbursement strategies for this integrated care.
Cross-cultural issues affecting palliative and end of life care.
Professional training and support, including content, effective methods, and relevant outcomes.
According to the World Health Organization,10 palliative care affirms life through the active total care of patients whose disease is not responsive to curative treatment. It neither hastens nor postpones death. Its goal is to achieve the best quality of life for patients and their families during illness and bereavement. Contro and colleagues demonstrate that we are far from reaching this goal in pediatrics.1 We must use our current knowledge and resources creatively to immediately assure a basic level of quality care while marshaling the research and planning efforts necessary to make this care the best possible. Our children deserve no less.
Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature
Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal
Instructions
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine editors. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest* Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more
Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features
Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature Clinical Resolution
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature Clinical Scenario
All results at JAMAevidence.com >
and access these and other features:
Register Now
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.