We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Being Specific About Being Special Defining Children's Conditions and Special Health Care Needs

Matthew M. Davis, MD, MAPP; Jeffrey P. Brosco, MD, PhD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(10):1003-1005. doi:10.1001/archpedi.161.10.1003.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Should there be a single definition of child illness? Should what qualifies as a chronic condition of childhood be defined in absolute or relative terms?

Over the past 2 decades, many research and policy groups have recommended different approaches to conceptualizing, defining, and measuring child illness and wellness. Scholars disagree on almost every dimension of child health status: whether to define health status based on specific diagnoses, functional state, or health care use or need; how to account for the severity of a condition; whether to include children at risk but not yet diagnosed; and whether to limit definitions to traditionally medical (as separate from behavioral) conditions. There is even debate about the amount of time a child experiences a certain condition before it should be categorized as chronic: 3 months, 6 months, or 12 months—or expected to last that long.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview


Place holder to copy figure label and caption

National estimates of prevalence of childhood chronic conditions, children with a special health care need (SHCN), and functional limitations from the National Survey of Children's Health, 2003-2004.14 Data are our estimates (rounded to the nearest hundred) based on analyses weighted for stratified probability sampling of the data set.

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

10 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
Qualitative Research

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
Are the results credible?