0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Special Feature |

Picture of the Month—Diagnosis FREE

[+] Author Affiliations

Section Editor: Samir S. Shah, MD

More Author Information
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(8):774. doi:10.1001/archpedi.161.8.774.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Axial CT scan of the upper abdomen at the level of the kidneys revealed a triangular area of increased density in the right-sided mesentery (Figure 1). It was located between the anterior abdominal wall and the antimesenteric border of the transverse colon (Figure 2). Axial CT scan at the level of the cecum did not show the noncompressible, blind-ending tubular structure larger than 6 mm that is characteristic of appendicitis. A few small mesenteric nodes were noted (not shown), but they were neither sizable nor great enough in quantity to suggest mesenteric adenitis. No thick bowel that was indicative of inflammatory bowel disease was seen. Laparoscopy showed an inflammatory mass of necrotic omentum adhering to the anterior abdominal wall (Figure 3). Following surgical resection, the patient's pain lessened. These findings are consistent with omental infarction.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Axial computed tomography through the patient's upper abdomen at the level of the kidneys. Triangular area of radiodense omental fat (arrows) is seen anteriorly within the right abdomen.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Two-dimensional coronal reconstruction of abdominal computed tomography. Note the position of the triangular hazy gray density (arrows) in relation to the stomach and the transverse colon (arrowhead).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Surgical photograph of right upper quadrant. The inflamed, infarcted omentum (arrows) was noted to be adherent to the anterior abdominal wall, elevated on this image by laparoscopic insufflation.

Graphic Jump Location

Omental infarction, traditionally considered to be a fairly rare cause of abdominal pain in children, is being diagnosed with increasing frequency owing to the greater availability of CT and the rising prevalence of obesity, a known risk factor.1 Pediatric patients account for 15% of cases. Omental infarction may be idiopathic in nature or may result from omental vessel thrombosis secondary to hypercoagulability, vasculitis,2 anomalous arterial supply, venous kinking with increased intra-abdominal pressure (eg, from trauma or unaccustomed exercise), or postprandial vascular congestion.1 It may also be caused by torsion of bifid or accessory omenta or prominent fat deposits on the anatomically normal omenta found in obese patients.

Because the right lateral aspect of the omentum is the most mobile, it is the omental portion that is most likely to torse. Omental infarction, therefore, typically presents with right-sided abdominal pain and local peritoneal signs.3 The presentation is otherwise variable. Fever, leukocytosis, and gastrointestinal tract symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation) are reported inconsistently.13 In children, omental infarction is nearly always clinically mistaken for appendicitis.4

Radiological identification of omental infarction is best made using CT. It is classically described as a heterogenous (mixed-density) soft-tissue mass that is oval or triangular in shape within an area of omental fat, positioned between the antimesenteric border of the transverse or ascending colon and the anterior abdominal muscles.4,5 Inflammatory mesenteric stranding is frequently seen. Parietal peritoneal thickening and/or adherence, as well as mass effect on the adjacent bowel, may be present. Ultrasonography, considered insensitive and somewhat nonspecific for the diagnosis, may demonstrate a solid, hyperechoic, noncompressible mass.1,5 It is most helpful in identifying other specific differential diagnostic possibilities, such as nonperforated appendicitis.2 Resolution may occur spontaneously with conservative management, but an argument may be made in favor of laparoscopic excision, which speeds clinical recovery and prevents the development of complicating abscesses or bowel-obstructing adhesions.2,3,5

Correspondence: Harris L. Cohen, MD, 78 Grove Ave, Cedarhurst, NY 11516-2311 (hcohenmb@optonline.net).

Accepted for Publication: November 16, 2006.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Hu and Cohen. Acquisition of data: Hu, Cohen, and Scriven. Analysis and interpretation of data: Cohen. Drafting of the manuscript: Hu. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Cohen and Scriven. Administrative, technical, and material support: Cohen and Scriven. Study supervision: Cohen and Scriven.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

McClure  MJKhalili  KSarrazin  JHanbidge  A Radiological features of epiploic appendagitis and segmental omental infarction. Clin Radiol 2001;56 (10) 819- 827
PubMed Link to Article
Myers  MTCohen  HLedSivit  CJed Segmental omental infarction. Fetal & Pediatric Ultrasound: A Casebook Approach. New York, NY McGraw Hill2001;466- 468
Varjavandi  VLessin  MKooros  KFusunyan  RMcCauley  RGilchrist  B Omental infarction: risk factors in children. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38 (2) 233- 235
PubMed Link to Article
Sung  TCallahan  MJTaylor  GA Clinical and imaging mimickers of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186 (1) 67- 74
PubMed Link to Article
Grattan-Smith  JDBlews  DEBrand  T Omental infarction in pediatric patients: sonographic and CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178 (6) 1537- 1539
PubMed Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Axial computed tomography through the patient's upper abdomen at the level of the kidneys. Triangular area of radiodense omental fat (arrows) is seen anteriorly within the right abdomen.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Two-dimensional coronal reconstruction of abdominal computed tomography. Note the position of the triangular hazy gray density (arrows) in relation to the stomach and the transverse colon (arrowhead).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Surgical photograph of right upper quadrant. The inflamed, infarcted omentum (arrows) was noted to be adherent to the anterior abdominal wall, elevated on this image by laparoscopic insufflation.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

McClure  MJKhalili  KSarrazin  JHanbidge  A Radiological features of epiploic appendagitis and segmental omental infarction. Clin Radiol 2001;56 (10) 819- 827
PubMed Link to Article
Myers  MTCohen  HLedSivit  CJed Segmental omental infarction. Fetal & Pediatric Ultrasound: A Casebook Approach. New York, NY McGraw Hill2001;466- 468
Varjavandi  VLessin  MKooros  KFusunyan  RMcCauley  RGilchrist  B Omental infarction: risk factors in children. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38 (2) 233- 235
PubMed Link to Article
Sung  TCallahan  MJTaylor  GA Clinical and imaging mimickers of acute appendicitis in the pediatric population. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186 (1) 67- 74
PubMed Link to Article
Grattan-Smith  JDBlews  DEBrand  T Omental infarction in pediatric patients: sonographic and CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178 (6) 1537- 1539
PubMed Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections