0
Article |

A Methodology to Maximize Resident Input in Improving a Pediatric Rotation FREE

Joel A. Fein, MD; Jane M. Lavelle, MD; Kenneth R. Ginsburg, MD, MSEd; Angelo P. Giardino, MD, MSEd
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(8):840-844. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170450090015.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective:  To develop a structured process to gain resident input into the improvement of their educational experience by (1) taking a small amount of resident time and effort, (2) fostering the generation of new ideas, (3) allowing the prioritization of ideas, (4) generating implementation plans for the ideas, and (5) offering the participants relative anonymity.

Design:  Cross-sectional survey and group sessions.

Setting:  Urban, university-based children's hospital.

Participants:  Members of the pediatric residency program in the 1993-1994 academic year.

Interventions and Results:  The process was piloted for an emergency department rotation and borrows aspects of the Delphi Technique, Nominal Group Technique, and focus group methods. A survey regarding an emergency department rotation was distributed to all pediatric residents, and the 10 most commonly noted problems were compiled. These problems were brought to group sessions held for each level of training. Problems not listed were added if they were mentioned during the session; however, no problem was removed from the list. The sessions, designed to offer relative anonymity to the residents, included an initial clarification period, a roundrobin prioritization of ideas, and an open discussion designed to generate solutions. Resident-generated solutions resulting from the group sessions were reviewed by the attending staff, and changes were implemented during the next year.

Conclusion:  The technique that we developed is a practical and time-efficient method of incorporating resident perspectives into the improvement of a rotation.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:840-844

REFERENCES

Lamb GA, Weinberger HL, Schneiderman H, Goldstein B.  Systematic utilization of data for analysis of a pediatric emergency room experience . Pediatrics . 1975;;55:266-274.
Berg RA, Rimsza ME, Eisenberg N, Ganelin RS.  Evaluation of a successful biosocial rotation . AJDC . 1983;;137:1066-1068.
Loughlin KG, Moore LF.  Using Delphi to achieve congruent objectives and activities in a pediatrics department . J Med Educ . 1979;;54:101-106.
Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes . Glenview, III: Scott Foresman & Co; 1975;.
Ginsburg KR, Slap GB, Cnaan A, Forke CM, Balsley CM, Rouselle DM.  Adolescents' perceptions of factors affecting their decisions to seek health care . JAMA . 1995;;273:1913-1918.
Thomas B.  Using nominal group technique to identify researchable problems . J Nurs Educ . 1983;;22:335-337.
Gallagher M, Hares T, Spencer J, Bradshaw C, Webb I.  The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice? Fam Pract . 1993;;10:76-81.
Moore C. Group Techniques for Idea Building . Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1987;: chap2 .
DesRosier MB, Cavanaugh KC.  Focus groups: a program planning technique . J Nurs Adm . 1989;;19:20-25.
Leape LL, Freshour MA, Douwe Y, Hsiao W.  Small-group judgment methods for determining resource-based relative values . Med Care . 1992;;30:NS2-NS39.

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Lamb GA, Weinberger HL, Schneiderman H, Goldstein B.  Systematic utilization of data for analysis of a pediatric emergency room experience . Pediatrics . 1975;;55:266-274.
Berg RA, Rimsza ME, Eisenberg N, Ganelin RS.  Evaluation of a successful biosocial rotation . AJDC . 1983;;137:1066-1068.
Loughlin KG, Moore LF.  Using Delphi to achieve congruent objectives and activities in a pediatrics department . J Med Educ . 1979;;54:101-106.
Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH. Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes . Glenview, III: Scott Foresman & Co; 1975;.
Ginsburg KR, Slap GB, Cnaan A, Forke CM, Balsley CM, Rouselle DM.  Adolescents' perceptions of factors affecting their decisions to seek health care . JAMA . 1995;;273:1913-1918.
Thomas B.  Using nominal group technique to identify researchable problems . J Nurs Educ . 1983;;22:335-337.
Gallagher M, Hares T, Spencer J, Bradshaw C, Webb I.  The nominal group technique: a research tool for general practice? Fam Pract . 1993;;10:76-81.
Moore C. Group Techniques for Idea Building . Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1987;: chap2 .
DesRosier MB, Cavanaugh KC.  Focus groups: a program planning technique . J Nurs Adm . 1989;;19:20-25.
Leape LL, Freshour MA, Douwe Y, Hsiao W.  Small-group judgment methods for determining resource-based relative values . Med Care . 1992;;30:NS2-NS39.

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.