0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Clinician Agreement on Physical Findings in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Sara H. Sinai, MD; Michael R. Lawless, MD; David Y. Rainey, MD, MPH; V. Denise Everett, MD; Desmond K. Runyan, MD, DrPH; Thomas Frothingham, MD; Marcia Herman-Giddens, DrPH, PA; Karen St Claire, MD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(5):497-501. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170420067011.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objectives:  To measure agreement among experienced clinicians regarding the interpretation of physical findings in child sexual abuse cases and to determine whether knowledge of clinical history affects the interpretation of the physical findings.

Design:  Experienced clinicians rated colposcopic photographs on a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being normal and 5 being clear evidence of penetrating injury. To answer an additional study question of whether clinical history affected interpretation, 4 clinicians rated 69 cases in which they were blinded to the patients' histories and 70 cases in which the patients' histories were available. The other 3 clinicians then rated the same cases with the presence or absence of history reversed.

Setting:  All clinicians involved perform child sexual abuse examinations at tertiary care centers.

Patients:  A total of 139 girls with Tanner stage 1 or 2 genitalia who were referred to a general pediatric clinic at an academic medical center for examination of possible sexual abuse.

Results:  Half of the photographs were interpreted as indicating little or no evidence of abuse. Of those photographic sets that both readers could interpret, 39% were in perfect agreement and 77% disagreed by 1 category or less. Perfect agreement across all possible pairs of readers was 34.5%. Agreement was better when the patient's clinical history was unknown (29.3% vs 38.9%, P=.005). The κ a measure of interrater reliability, indicated poor agreement among clinicians. The combined κ for the first group of clinicians was 0.22 without knowledge of clinical history and 0.11 with knowledge of clinical history. For the second group of clinicians, the κ was 0.31 without knowledge of clinical history and 0.15 with knowledge of clinical history. The overall κ across all 7 clinicians disregarding clinical history was 0.20. Agreement was best for categories 1 (normal, κ=0.28) and 5 (clear evidence of a penetrating injury, κ=0.39).

Conclusions:  Clinicians educated and experienced in assessing child sexual abuse do not agree perfectly on the interpretation of photographs of genital findings in girls with Tanner stage 1 or 2 genitalia. Clinicians agree less when a patient's clinical history is available. Efforts should be directed at standardizing physical findings and avoiding overemphasis on physical findings in child sexual abuse cases.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:497-501

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();