0
Article |

A Comparison of Screening Strategies for Elevated Blood Lead Levels FREE

James R. Campbell, MD, MPH; Mary Paris, MPH; Stanley J. Schaffer, MD, MS
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(11):1205-1208. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170360095016.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective:  To calculate and compare the average expected cost per child screened (hereafter referred to as COST) among various screening strategies.

Design:  A decision analysis of 5 strategies: (1) conduct risk assessment and screen high-risk children by venipuncture, low-risk children by fingerstick; (2) screen all children by fingerstick; (3) screen all children by venipuncture; (4) conduct risk assessment, screen high-risk children by fingerstick; and (5) conduct risk assessment, screen high-risk children by venipuncture. We assumed all fingerstick blood lead levels of 0.72 μmol/L or higher (≥15 μg/dL) would be confirmed by venipuncture. Baseline variables taken from the literature included prevalence of elevated blood lead levels in the pediatric population (2%), sensitivity and specificity of fingerstick blood lead assay (90% each), specificity of risk assessment (50%), sensitivity of risk assessment at blood lead levels of 0.48 to 0.68 μmol/L (10-14 μg/dL and 0.72 μmol/L or higher (≥15 μg/dL) (65% and 85%, respectively), cost of blood lead assay ($6), cost to obtain blood by venipuncture ($4) and fingerstick ($2), and cost to get a child who has a fingerstick blood lead level of 0.72 μmol/L or higher (≥15 μg/dL) to return ($0.18). Sensitivity analysis determined whether selected variables affected the COST.

Results:  The COSTs for strategies 1 through 5 were $9.07, $8.16, $10, $4.13, and $5.04, respectively. Among the universal strategies, screening children by fingerstick had the lowest COST at a prevalence of less than 38% and fingerstick blood lead assay a specificity of greater than 62%. Among the selective strategies, screening high-risk children by fingerstick had the lowest COST at a prevalence of less than 38% and fingerstick blood lead an assay specificity of greater than 63%.

Conclusion:  At a readily attainable specificity of the fingerstick blood lead assay, practices serving a patient population with a prevalence of elevated blood lead levels of less than 38% will have the lowest COST when a fingerstick screening strategy is used.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:1205-1208

REFERENCES

Centers for Disease Control. Preventing lead poisoning in young children . Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1991;.
Baker B.  Like politics, all lead screening should be local . Pediatric News . 1995;; 29:1-2.
Glotzer DE, Bauchner H, Freedberg KA, Palfrey S.  Screening for childhood lead poisoning: a cost-minimization analysis . Am J Public Health . 1994;;84:110-112.
Campbell JR, Schaffer SJ, Szilagyi PG, O'Connor K, Briss P, Weitzman M. Blood lead screening practices among US pediatricians. Pediatrics. In press.
Sargent JD, Dalton M, Stukel TA, Roda S, Klein RZ.  Evaluation of methods to reduce lead contamination of capillary blood specimens . Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med . 1995;;149:P70.
Brody DJ, Pirkle JL, Kramer RA, et al.  Blood lead levels in the US population: phase 1 of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination (NHANES III, 1988 to 1991) . JAMA . 1994;;272:277-283.
Binns HJ, LeBailly SA, Poncher J, Kinsella TR, Saunders SE, and the Pediatric Practice Research Group.  Is there lead in the suburbs? risk asessment in Chicago suburban pediatric practices . Pediatrics . 1994;;93:164-171.
Schaffer SJ, Kincaid MS, Endres N, Weitzman M.  Lead poisoning risk determination in a rural setting . Pediatrics . 1996;;97:84-90.
Rifai N, Cohen G, Wolf M, et al.  Incidence of lead poisoning in young children from inner-city, suburban and rural communities . Ther Drug Monit . 1993;;15:71-74.
Taubman B, Wiley C, Henretig F.  Prevalence of elevated blood lead levels in a suburban middle class private practice . Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med . 1994;;148: 757-760.
Rifai N, Faser C, Cohen G, Wolf M, DePalma L.  Lead poisoning in young children in Washington, DC . AJDC . 1992;;146:1259-1260.
Casey R, Wiley C, Rutstein R, Pinto-Martin J.  Prevalence of lead poisoning in an urban cohort of infants with high socioeconomic status . Clin Pediatr . 1994;; 33:480-484.
Cook M, Chappell WR, Hoffman RE, Mangione EJ.  Assessment of blood lead levels in children living in a historic mining and smelting community . Am J Epidemiol . 1993;;137:447-455.
Norman EH, Bordley C, Hertz-Picciotto I, Newton DA.  Rural-urban blood lead differences in North Carolina children . Pediatrics . 1994;;94:59-64.
Schaffer SJ, Szilagyi PG, Weitzman M.  Lead poisoning risk determination in an urban population through the use of a standardized questionnaire . Pediatrics . 1994;;93:159-163.
Jiang H, Moy F, Frey MJ, et al.  Fingerstick microsampling for lead toxicity screening . Pediatr Res . 1994;;35:115A.
McGregor RS, Jones J, Maksimak JF, Malone WJ.  Comparison of venipuncture lead determination vs standard fingerstick methodology . AJDC . 1993;;147:438.
Schonfeld DJ, Cullen MD, Rainey PM, et al.  Screening for lead poisoning in an urban pediatric clinic using samples obtained by fingerstick . Pediatrics . 1994;; 94:174-179.
Schlenker TL, Fritz CJ, Mark D, et al.  Screening for pediatric lead poisoning . JAMA . 1994;;271:1346-1348.
Sargent JD, Klein RZ.  Rethinking the threshold for blood lead elevation in the clinical setting . Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med . 1995;;149:P78.
Tejeda DM, Wyatt DD, Rostek BR, Solomon WB.  Do questions about lead exposure predict elevated lead levels? Pediatrics . 1994;;93:192-194.
Rooney BL, Hayes EB, Allen BK, Strutt PJ.  Development of a screening tool for prediction in a midwestern clinical setting . Pediatrics . 1994;;93:183-187.
Nordin JD, Rolnick SJ, Griffin JM.  Prevalence of excess lead absorption and associated risk factors in children enrolled in a midwestern health maintenance organization . Pediatrics . 1994;;93:172-177.
Lyngbye T, Jorgensen PJ, Grandjean P, Hansen ON.  Validity and interpretation of blood lead levels . Scand J Clin Lab Invest . 1990;;50:441-449.
Sargent JD, Dalton M, Stukel T, Klein RZ.  An easily applied barrier method reduces lead contamination of capillary blood specimens . AJDC . 1993;;147:435.
Mitchell DG, Aldous KM, Ryan FJ.  Mass screening for lead poisoning . N Y State J Med . 1974;;74:1599-1603.
Finkler SA.  The distinction between costs and charges . Ann Int Med . 1982;; 96:102-109.
Campbell JR, McConnochie KM, Weitzman M.  Lead screening among high-risk urban children . Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med . 1994;;148:688-693.
Hollenberg J. SMLTREE: The All Purpose Decision Tree Builder . Version 2.9; New York, NY: 1989;.
Pirkle JL, Brody DJ, Gunter EW, et al.  The decline in blood lead levels in the United States . JAMA . 1994;;272:284-291.
Gellert GA, Wagner GA, Maxwell RM, Moore D, Foster L.  Lead poisoning among low-income children in Orange County, California . JAMA . 1993;;270:69-71.
Gammage B, McLaine P. Implications of universal blood lead screening. Poster presentation at the Alliance to End Childhood Lead Poisoning, Washington, DC, October 1991.

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Centers for Disease Control. Preventing lead poisoning in young children . Atlanta, Ga: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1991;.
Baker B.  Like politics, all lead screening should be local . Pediatric News . 1995;; 29:1-2.
Glotzer DE, Bauchner H, Freedberg KA, Palfrey S.  Screening for childhood lead poisoning: a cost-minimization analysis . Am J Public Health . 1994;;84:110-112.
Campbell JR, Schaffer SJ, Szilagyi PG, O'Connor K, Briss P, Weitzman M. Blood lead screening practices among US pediatricians. Pediatrics. In press.
Sargent JD, Dalton M, Stukel TA, Roda S, Klein RZ.  Evaluation of methods to reduce lead contamination of capillary blood specimens . Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med . 1995;;149:P70.
Brody DJ, Pirkle JL, Kramer RA, et al.  Blood lead levels in the US population: phase 1 of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination (NHANES III, 1988 to 1991) . JAMA . 1994;;272:277-283.
Binns HJ, LeBailly SA, Poncher J, Kinsella TR, Saunders SE, and the Pediatric Practice Research Group.  Is there lead in the suburbs? risk asessment in Chicago suburban pediatric practices . Pediatrics . 1994;;93:164-171.
Schaffer SJ, Kincaid MS, Endres N, Weitzman M.  Lead poisoning risk determination in a rural setting . Pediatrics . 1996;;97:84-90.
Rifai N, Cohen G, Wolf M, et al.  Incidence of lead poisoning in young children from inner-city, suburban and rural communities . Ther Drug Monit . 1993;;15:71-74.
Taubman B, Wiley C, Henretig F.  Prevalence of elevated blood lead levels in a suburban middle class private practice . Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med . 1994;;148: 757-760.
Rifai N, Faser C, Cohen G, Wolf M, DePalma L.  Lead poisoning in young children in Washington, DC . AJDC . 1992;;146:1259-1260.
Casey R, Wiley C, Rutstein R, Pinto-Martin J.  Prevalence of lead poisoning in an urban cohort of infants with high socioeconomic status . Clin Pediatr . 1994;; 33:480-484.
Cook M, Chappell WR, Hoffman RE, Mangione EJ.  Assessment of blood lead levels in children living in a historic mining and smelting community . Am J Epidemiol . 1993;;137:447-455.
Norman EH, Bordley C, Hertz-Picciotto I, Newton DA.  Rural-urban blood lead differences in North Carolina children . Pediatrics . 1994;;94:59-64.
Schaffer SJ, Szilagyi PG, Weitzman M.  Lead poisoning risk determination in an urban population through the use of a standardized questionnaire . Pediatrics . 1994;;93:159-163.
Jiang H, Moy F, Frey MJ, et al.  Fingerstick microsampling for lead toxicity screening . Pediatr Res . 1994;;35:115A.
McGregor RS, Jones J, Maksimak JF, Malone WJ.  Comparison of venipuncture lead determination vs standard fingerstick methodology . AJDC . 1993;;147:438.
Schonfeld DJ, Cullen MD, Rainey PM, et al.  Screening for lead poisoning in an urban pediatric clinic using samples obtained by fingerstick . Pediatrics . 1994;; 94:174-179.
Schlenker TL, Fritz CJ, Mark D, et al.  Screening for pediatric lead poisoning . JAMA . 1994;;271:1346-1348.
Sargent JD, Klein RZ.  Rethinking the threshold for blood lead elevation in the clinical setting . Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med . 1995;;149:P78.
Tejeda DM, Wyatt DD, Rostek BR, Solomon WB.  Do questions about lead exposure predict elevated lead levels? Pediatrics . 1994;;93:192-194.
Rooney BL, Hayes EB, Allen BK, Strutt PJ.  Development of a screening tool for prediction in a midwestern clinical setting . Pediatrics . 1994;;93:183-187.
Nordin JD, Rolnick SJ, Griffin JM.  Prevalence of excess lead absorption and associated risk factors in children enrolled in a midwestern health maintenance organization . Pediatrics . 1994;;93:172-177.
Lyngbye T, Jorgensen PJ, Grandjean P, Hansen ON.  Validity and interpretation of blood lead levels . Scand J Clin Lab Invest . 1990;;50:441-449.
Sargent JD, Dalton M, Stukel T, Klein RZ.  An easily applied barrier method reduces lead contamination of capillary blood specimens . AJDC . 1993;;147:435.
Mitchell DG, Aldous KM, Ryan FJ.  Mass screening for lead poisoning . N Y State J Med . 1974;;74:1599-1603.
Finkler SA.  The distinction between costs and charges . Ann Int Med . 1982;; 96:102-109.
Campbell JR, McConnochie KM, Weitzman M.  Lead screening among high-risk urban children . Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med . 1994;;148:688-693.
Hollenberg J. SMLTREE: The All Purpose Decision Tree Builder . Version 2.9; New York, NY: 1989;.
Pirkle JL, Brody DJ, Gunter EW, et al.  The decline in blood lead levels in the United States . JAMA . 1994;;272:284-291.
Gellert GA, Wagner GA, Maxwell RM, Moore D, Foster L.  Lead poisoning among low-income children in Orange County, California . JAMA . 1993;;270:69-71.
Gammage B, McLaine P. Implications of universal blood lead screening. Poster presentation at the Alliance to End Childhood Lead Poisoning, Washington, DC, October 1991.

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.