We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Prediabetic Markers in Children With Stress Hyperglycemia

Donna M. Bhisitkul, MD; Aaron I. Vinik, MD, PhD; Ardythe L. Morrow, PhD; Jin-Xiong She, PhD; Justine Shults, MS; Alvin C. Powers, MD; Noel K. Maclaren, MD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(9):936-941. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170340050010.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Background:  Previous studies have shown that children with stress hyperglycemia have an increased risk for development of type I or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Objective:   To determine whether stress hyperglycemia in prospectively screened pediatric patients represents a prediabetic state.

Design:  Prospective, cohort analytic study.

Setting:  The Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters is an urban pediatric emergency department at a tertiary care, university-based children's hospital in Norfolk, Va.

Patient Population:  All patients who required a venipuncture for evaluation of an acute illness or injury from October 1992 through March 1993 were screened prospectively for hyperglycemia (blood glucose level ≥8.3 mmol/L [≥ 150 mg/dL]). Each hyperglycemic patient was age matched to a stress control subject (defined as a nonhyperglycemic but acutely ill child) from the emergency department and a healthy control subject from a well-child clinic.

Intervention:  Blood samples were obtained at the time of initial evaluation in the emergency department from 30 hyperglycemic patients (age range, 4 weeks to 12.4 years; median, 2 years), 30 stress control subjects, and 30 healthy control subjects. All samples were tested for islet cell antibodies, insulin autoantibodies, glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies, and HLA typing, specifically the genotypes at the DQB1 gene.

Main Outcome Measures:  The presence of immunologic or genetic markers for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and/or the clinical development of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Results:  No patients or control subjects were positive for islet cell antibodies. One hyperglycemic patient and 3 stress control subjects were positive for insulin autoantibodies; all 4 of these subjects had sickle-cell disease and fever. Four of the 8 patients with sickle-cell disease had insulin autoantibodies, compared with none of the 52 patients and stress control subjects without sickle-cell disease (P<.001). One healthy control subject had antibodies to GAD65. The patient group did not show increased genotypes at the DQB1 gene that were indicative of an enhanced risk for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Of the 32 hyperglycemic patients, 27 healthy control subjects, and 25 stress control subjects contacted for follow-up at 31 to 36 months, none has developed insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Conclusions:  Children with stress hyperglycemia do not have an increased prevalence of immunologic or genetic markers of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and thus do not appear to be at an increased risk for development of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Our data suggest that insulin autoantibodies develop in children subject to sickle cell crises.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:936-941


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.