0
Article |

Prediabetic Markers in Children With Stress Hyperglycemia

Donna M. Bhisitkul, MD; Aaron I. Vinik, MD, PhD; Ardythe L. Morrow, PhD; Jin-Xiong She, PhD; Justine Shults, MS; Alvin C. Powers, MD; Noel K. Maclaren, MD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(9):936-941. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170340050010.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background:  Previous studies have shown that children with stress hyperglycemia have an increased risk for development of type I or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Objective:   To determine whether stress hyperglycemia in prospectively screened pediatric patients represents a prediabetic state.

Design:  Prospective, cohort analytic study.

Setting:  The Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters is an urban pediatric emergency department at a tertiary care, university-based children's hospital in Norfolk, Va.

Patient Population:  All patients who required a venipuncture for evaluation of an acute illness or injury from October 1992 through March 1993 were screened prospectively for hyperglycemia (blood glucose level ≥8.3 mmol/L [≥ 150 mg/dL]). Each hyperglycemic patient was age matched to a stress control subject (defined as a nonhyperglycemic but acutely ill child) from the emergency department and a healthy control subject from a well-child clinic.

Intervention:  Blood samples were obtained at the time of initial evaluation in the emergency department from 30 hyperglycemic patients (age range, 4 weeks to 12.4 years; median, 2 years), 30 stress control subjects, and 30 healthy control subjects. All samples were tested for islet cell antibodies, insulin autoantibodies, glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies, and HLA typing, specifically the genotypes at the DQB1 gene.

Main Outcome Measures:  The presence of immunologic or genetic markers for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and/or the clinical development of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Results:  No patients or control subjects were positive for islet cell antibodies. One hyperglycemic patient and 3 stress control subjects were positive for insulin autoantibodies; all 4 of these subjects had sickle-cell disease and fever. Four of the 8 patients with sickle-cell disease had insulin autoantibodies, compared with none of the 52 patients and stress control subjects without sickle-cell disease (P<.001). One healthy control subject had antibodies to GAD65. The patient group did not show increased genotypes at the DQB1 gene that were indicative of an enhanced risk for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Of the 32 hyperglycemic patients, 27 healthy control subjects, and 25 stress control subjects contacted for follow-up at 31 to 36 months, none has developed insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Conclusions:  Children with stress hyperglycemia do not have an increased prevalence of immunologic or genetic markers of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and thus do not appear to be at an increased risk for development of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Our data suggest that insulin autoantibodies develop in children subject to sickle cell crises.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:936-941

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs