0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Role of the Primary Care Provider in Expediting Care of Children With Acute Appendicitis

Vidya T. Chande, MD; Janet M. Kinnane, MD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(7):703-706. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170320049008.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective:  To assess the role of the primary care provider (PCP) in the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis in children by determining whether there were differences in the treatment and outcome of children whose parents contacted the PCP before taking the child to the hospital compared with those who did not.

Design:  Retrospective review of medical records of pediatric patients discharged from the hospital with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Setting:  An urban children's hospital.

Methods:  The medical records of children treated for acute appendicitis from July 1,1990, through June 30, 1994, were identified through review of hospital discharge data and divided into 2 groups based on whether the children's parents had contacted the PCP before their arrival at the hospital. Contact with the PCP was determined by record review or telephone interview with the parent. The 2 groups were then studied for differences in treatment and outcome. Statistical analysis was by the χ2 test and the Student t test, as appropriate, with the level of significance determined at P<.05.

Results:  During the 4-year period, 343 children underwent appendectomy. Medical records were available for review for 321 children (94%). After review, records of 38 children were excluded because the primary problem was not acute appendicitis. Of the 283 children whose records were included in the study, the parents of 160 had contacted the PCP before arrival at the hospital (group 1, those who called) and the parents of 99 had not called (group 2, those who did not call). It could not be determined whether a call had been made for 24 children. The mean age of the children in group 1 was 124 months and in group 2 was 126 months (P=.74). Of group 1,24% arrived at the hospital on a Saturday or Sunday, compared with 40% of group 2 (P=.007). Children in group 1 who arrived at the hospital during the weekend were operated on a mean (SD) of 4.7 hours (3.7 hours) after arrival at the hospital, compared with 10.6 hours (17.1 hours) for children in group 2 (P=.04). The mean (SD) interval between arrival at the hospital and operation on weekdays (Monday through Friday) was similar in both groups: 12 hours (20.6 hours) in group 1 and 13.7 hours (25.6 hours) in group 2 (P=.63). Appendiceal perforation was less likely in children in group 1 (62/160 [39%]) than in those in group 2 (53/99 [54%]; P=.03). Parents of 50 (89%) of 56 children who belonged to a health maintenance organization called the PCP compared with 96 (62%) of the 156 with fee-for-service insurance and 10 (26%) of the 38 with Medicaid (P<.001). No difference was noted in the interval between arrival at the hospital and operation or incidence of appendiceal perforation according to type of insurance.

Conclusions:  Children with appendicitis whose parents contacted the PCP before arrival at the hospital were less likely to have appendiceal perforation than those whose parents did not call the PCP, irrespective of insurance status. Children whose parents called the PCP before arrival at the hospital during the weekend were operated on more promptly than were children whose parents did not call the PCP. Contact with the PCP was associated with more expeditious care of children with acute appendicitis.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:703-706

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();