0
Article |

Immunogenicity of Haemophilus influenzae Type b Polysaccharide—Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine in Infants

Sandra J. Holmes, PhD; Bernard Fritzell, MD; Kenneth P. Guito; John F. Esbenshade, MD; Mark M. Blatter, MD; Keith S. Reisinger, MD; Harry L. Keyserling, MD; Edward P. Rothstein, MD; Henry H. Bernstein, DO; Sandor Feldman, MD; Dan M. Granoff, MD
Am J Dis Child. 1993;147(8):832-836. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160320034015.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

• Objective.  —To compare the safety and immunogenicity of three investigational lots of Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide—tetanus toxoid (PRP-T) conjugate vaccine in infants.

Design.  —Amulticenter, randomized immunogenicity trial. Infants were vaccinated at 2,4, and 6 months of age with one of three lots of PRP-T. A control group received H influenzae type b oligomers conjugated to CRM197 (HbOC). Serum was obtained before each injection and 1 month after the third dose, and assayed blindly for antibody in one laboratory.

Subjects.  —Four hundred eighty-four infants from private pediatric practices located in five geographic areas.

Measurements and Results.  —There were no significant differences in the number of adverse events reported for infants receiving PRP-T or HbOC, and the rates did not exceed those observed previously in infants given diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine alone. Total serum anti-PRP antibody responses were analyzed in 336 infants who met strict inclusion criteria. After one, two, or three doses, the respective antibody responses to each of the three lots of PRP-T and to HbOC vaccine were similar. The only exception was one lot of PRP-T, which after one or two injections elicited significantly higher geometric mean antibody responses than the other two lots or the HbOC vaccine. After a third injection, there were no significant lot differences. Combining the data from the different lots, there were no significant differences in the geometric mean antibody concentration after three doses of PRP-T or HbOC (8.3 vs 7.7 μg/mL), and 95% and 91%, respectively, of infants had greater than 1.0 μg/mL of antibody. There were no significant differences in the magnitudes of the respective IgG1-, IgG2-, and IgM-specific antibody concentrations between infants given PRP-T or HbOC.

Conclusions.  —The three investigational lots of PRP-T tested were safe and were as immunogenic as or more so than the licensed HbOC conjugate vaccine.(AJDC. 1993;147:832-836)

Topics

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();