We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

A Comparative Study of Heel-stick Devices for Infant Blood Collection

Bosco Paes, MD; Marianne Janes, BScN, MHSc; Patsy Vegh; Frank LaDuca, PhD; Maureen Andrew, MD
Am J Dis Child. 1993;147(3):346-348. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160270108032.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


• Objective.  —To evaluate two heel-stick devices by comparing the volume of blood collected, blood sampling time, amount of hemolysis, pain inflicted during the procedure, and extent of bruising.

Design.  —Randomized trial.

Setting.  —Primary care center in a tertiary-level perinatal hospital.

Participants.  —Forty healthy, full-term newborns with a postnatal age of greater than 24 hours. Newborns were fed no more than 1½ hours before blood sample collection and fulfilled the requirement for routine phenylketonuria and thyroid screening.

Interventions.  —Newborns were allocated to a single stab with either an automated incision or a lancet puncture device.

Measurements/Main Results.  —The total volume of blood and blood sampling time were significantly better with the automated incision device (P<.001). Hemolysis was also reduced with the automated incision device (P<.03). Plasma hemoglobin levels were below 1.0 g/L in all samples obtained with the automated incision device and in 71 % of samples obtained with the lancet device. There were no differences in the extent of bruising or in pain symptoms manifested by mean increases in heart rate and percentage of time crying during the procedure.

Conclusions.  —The larger volume of blood obtained within a shorter period for blood collection and reduced hemolysis with the automated incision device make it a preferred instrument for neonatal blood collection.(AJDC. 1993;147:346-348)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.