We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

The Effect of 100% Oxygen on the Propagation of Tracheobronchial Injury During High-Frequency and Conventional Mechanical Ventilation

Thomas E. Wiswell, MD, MC; Susan H. Wiswell
Am J Dis Child. 1990;144(5):560-564. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150290054026.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


• We compared the histologic alterations in the tracheae and bronchi of 30 premature baboons that were ventilated with either 100% or prn (as needed) oxygen (the fraction of inspired oxygen necessary to maintain the PaO2 between 50 and 80 mm Hg). The baboons were treated with either conventional positive-pressure ventilation (7 were treated with 100%; 7, prn) or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (8 were treated with 100%; 8, prn). We used a semiquantitative scoring system to grade tissue changes in the trachea, carina, and main-stem bronchi. The fraction of inspired oxygen for all prn animals fell to a plateau of approximately 0.28 after 36 hours, where it remained for the duration of the study. The 15 100% baboons were ventilated for a mean of 139 hours, while the 15 prn baboons were ventilated for a mean of 151 hours. The findings in all conventional and oscillator-ventilated animals were similar and characterized by squamous metaplasia, cilia loss, and goblet cell loss. For both methods of ventilation, there were no differences in the injury scores between 100% and prn oxygen-treated animals. We concluded that there were no additional tracheobronchial histologic changes with 100% oxygen compared with prn oxygen.

(AJDC. 1990;144:560-564)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.