0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

THEUNKINDESTCUT

Thomas G. Storch, MD
Am J Dis Child. 1990;144(5):533. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1990.02150290027018.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

ABSTRACT

Provision of intensive care to very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants has recently come under intense scrutiny if not actual attack. The breakthroughs made 15 years ago that allow us to care for infants who weigh between 500 to 750 g at birth have not been followed by rapid improvements in their outcomes. Each year 8000 VLBW infants are born in this country. Currently, one third of these infants survive and many of the survivors have pulmonary and central nervous system disabilities that require years of care. The annual cost of their care to the public and private sectors is estimated at $250 million.

Some have written that the knowledge to care for these infants is beyond our grasp. Others believe that the public sector no longer has the financial resources to assume this task and suggest that monies earmarked for VLBW care would have a greater impact on overall child health care if given to preventive pediatrics. These claims are tied to a chilling argument that recipients of health care dollars should have the potential to repay society. Ideas like these have gained a measure of acceptance, in part because physicians, traditional defenders of the concept that health services

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();