0
Article |

Efficacy and Immunogenicity of Acellular Pertussis Vaccine by Manufacturer and Patient Age

Tatsuo Aoyama, MD, MPH; Yuji Murase, MD; Makoto Kato, MD; Hideto Iwai, MD; Takashi Iwata, MD
Am J Dis Child. 1989;143(6):655-659. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1989.02150180033015.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

• Acellular pertussis vaccines, which have been used in Japan since 1981, vary in antigenic constituents among manufacturers. First, to assess the immunogenicity by manufacturer and patient age, 161 children aged 3 months to 2 years were immunized by acellular pertussis vaccine from one of three Japanese manufacturers, Biken, Takeda, or Kitasato. Anti-pertussis toxin antibody responses for children immunized with Takeda and Kitasato vaccines were comparable with patients with pertussis in the convalescent stage, and anti-pertussis toxin antibody response for Biken vaccine was far higher than those of convalescing patients. Anti-filamentous hemagglutinin antibody responses for the children given the three vaccines were far higher than those of the patients. Weak serotype 1.3 agglutinin responses were observed only in children administered the Takeda vaccine. Comparing these antibody responses among various age groups, the immunogenicity of acellular vaccines in children aged 3 to 6 months was comparable with children aged 2 years. Second, to assess the manufacturer-specific efficacy, 495 households of patients with pertussis were surveyed from 1981 to 1988. The estimated efficacy of the acellular pertussis vaccines in children aged 2 to 8 years was 82%, and there were no major differences in the secondary attack rates among children immunized with acellular pertussis vaccine from each manufacturer, ie, 12.5% (1/8) for Biken, 11.1% (2/18) for Takeda, and 5.9% (1/17) for Kitasato. We conclude from these two studies that similar efficacy was observed in children aged 2 years or older for acellular pertussis vaccines from the three manufacturers, which produced anti-pertussis toxin antibody responses comparable with patients with pertussis and far higher antifilamentous hemagglutinin antibody responses than in the convalescing patients, and that age did not affect the immunogenicity of acellular vaccines.

(AJDC. 1989;143:655-659)

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs