0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

The Case for Ipecac Syrup

WILLIAM BANNER JR, MD, PHD; JOSEPH C. VELTRI, PHARMD
Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(6):596. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1988.02150060030020.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Methods of gastric decontamination have generated controversy among physicians treating toxin-related emergencies. A number of methods of decontamination exist, including induced emesis (by ipecac syrup, mild detergents, or apomorphine), nasogastric or orogastric lavage, and oral activated charcoal. No distinct advantages in effectiveness have been attributed to any of these methods in particular.

Charcoal is currently experiencing a resurgence of support in some publications1 and has been suggested by some authors as a replacement for emesis as a method of decontamination for nonacute poisonings. This may contribute to confusion by some practitioners and consumers who are concerned about the appropriate role of emesis in the management of poisoned patients. In some situations the characteristics of activated charcoal may make it the most appropriate mode of decontamination. Intoxication with a substance that has a rapid onset of toxicity and for which emesis would be contraindicated

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();