We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Survival of Infants With Spina Bifida—Atlanta, 1972-1979

Melissa M. Adams, MPH; Frank Greenberg, MD; Muin J. Khoury, MD; James S. Marks, MD, MPH; Godfrey P. Oakley Jr, MD, MSPH
Am J Dis Child. 1985;139(5):518-523. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1985.02140070092045.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


• We studied the survival of a population-based cohort of 154 infants with spina bifida who were born during the eight-year period from 1972 through 1979 to residents of Atlanta. Our objectives were to describe the cohort's survival experience and to explore relationships between clinical characteristics and survival. Overall, 57% of the cohort survived one year or more. This figure is misleading, however, because it conceals important differences in survival among subgroups of affected infants. From univariate analyses, we observed significant differences in survival among infants categorized by year of birth, birth weight, the open-closed status of the defect, the highest level of the defect on the spine, the presence of multiple major birth defects, and the presence of hydrocephalus at birth. More infants born in the late 1970s survived their first year of life than infants born in the early 1970s; infants with open defects had lower survival than those with closed defects; and infants whose defects were low on the spine had better survival than those whose defects were higher. When comparing the survival experience of this cohort with that of other groups from other areas or from more recent years, health workers must consider referral biases and differences in the distribution of clinical characteristics.

(AJDC 1985;139:518-523)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.