We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Trends in Clinical Characteristics of Infants With Spina Bifida—Atlanta, 1972-1979

Melissa M. Adams, MPH; Frank Greenberg, MD; Muin J. Khoury, MD; James S. Marks, MD, MPH; Godfrey P. Oakley Jr, MD, MSPH
Am J Dis Child. 1985;139(5):514-517. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1985.02140070088044.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


• In Atlanta, the birth prevalence of spina bifida declined from 10.1 per 10,000 live births in 1972-1973 to 5.8 per 10,000 live births in 1978-1979. This trend cannot be explained by use of prenatal diagnosis, because it was unavailable in Atlanta until 1976, and even in the late 1970s was not used widely. To determine if this decrease was associated with changes in the distribution of clinical characteristics among infants with spina bifida, we reviewed the medical records of a population-based group of 154 infants with spina bifida, born in Atlanta during the eight-year period from 1972 through 1979. Distribution by the highest level of the defect on the spine did not change during these years. The proportions of infants with isolated spina bifida (ie, no other major malformations) and with open spina bifida (ie, not covered by skin) did, however, decrease. When we examined these two characteristics simultaneously, we found declines in both the proportion of infants with open-isolated spina bifida and the birth prevalence of infants with open-isolated spina bifida. If this trend persists, it will have important implications for workers involved with prenatal α-fetoprotein screening and researchers investigating the etiology of spina bifida.

(AJDC 1985;139:514-517)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.