We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article |

Comparative Analysis of Four Methods for Rapid Glucose Determination in Neonates

Robert H. Perelman, MD; Gary R. Gutcher, MD; Michael J. Engle, PhD; Michael J. MacDonald, MD, PhD
Am J Dis Child. 1982;136(12):1051-1053. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1982.03970480017003.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


• As an important aspect of newborn care, the rapid assessment of glucose homeostasis is often accomplished by a glucose oxidase—peroxidase chromagen test strip method, either alone or with a reflectance colorimeter. The precision of these techniques has been established, but few studies have determined accuracy in an intensive care setting. We performed the following study. During the time of routine heelstick blood sampling, the nurses collected 90 complete study sets for glucose analysis from 43 neonates. Dextrostix, Ames Meter, Chemstrip bG, and Stat Tek Meter determinations were performed according to manufacturers' instructions. Concurrent determination of blood glucose level by a glucose analyzer (Beckman) served as a standard for comparison. There was no significant difference in estimation of true blood glucose concentration among the rapid methods tested. The marked variability of results suggests only modest accuracy in estimating whole blood glucose concentration when employed in the routine neonatal clinical setting. These data indicate that the results from rapid blood glucose estimation techniques require confirmation by conventional laboratory methods prior to therapeutic intervention.

(Am J Dis Child 1982;136:1051-1053)


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.