0
Article |

Clinical Evaluation of a New Measles-Mumps-Rubella Trivalent Vaccine FREE

Anton J. F. Schwarz, MD; Joseph E. Jackson, MD, DrPH; N. Joel Ehrenkranz, MD; Arnoldo Ventura, PhD; Gilbert M. Schiff, MD; Vernon W. Walters, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Received for publication Aug 30, 1974; accepted Dec 16.

Reprint requests to Biological Clinical Research Department, Dow Chemical Company, PO Box 68511, Indianapolis, IN 46268 (Dr Jackson).


Am J Dis Child. 1975;129(12):1408-1412. doi:10.1001/archpedi.1975.02120490026008.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

• In a series of clinical studies of a combined measles (Schwarz strain), mumps (Jeryl Lynn strain), and rubella (Cendehill strain) vaccine, 1,481 children received the vaccine or a placebo. The vaccine did not cause any significant reactions. The frequencies of mild, transient fever or rash or both in triple-susceptible vaccinees were similar to those that follow use of Schwarz strain measles vaccine alone. Measles, mumps, and rubella seroconversion rates in triple-susceptible vaccinees ranged from 95% to 100%. Geometric mean antibody titers were as high as those that usually result from use of these same virus strains as monovalent vaccines.

(Am J Dis Child 129:1408-1412, 1975)

REFERENCES

Schwarz AJF:  Preliminary tests of a highly attenuated measles vaccine . Am J Dis Child 103:386-389, 1962;.
Schwarz AJF:  Immunization against measles: Development and evaluation of a highly attenuated live measles vaccine . Ann Pediatr 202:241-252, 1964;.
Schwarz AJF, Anderson JT, Ramos-Alvarez M, et al:  Extensive clinical evaluations of a highly attenuated live measles vaccine . JAMA 199:26-30, 1967;.
Weibel RE, Stokes J Jr, Buynak EB, et al:  Live attenuated mumps-virus vaccine: 3. Clinical and serologic aspects in a field evaluation . N Engl J Med 276:245-251, 1967;.
Hilleman MR, Weibel RE, Buynak EB, et al:  Live, attenuated mumps-virus vaccine: 4. Protective efficacy as measured in a field evaluation . N Engl J Med 276:252-258, 1967;.
Hilleman MR, Buynak EB, Weibel RE, et al:  Live, attenuated mumps-virus vaccine . N Engl J Med 278:227-232, 1968;.
DuPan RM, Huygelen C, Peetermans J, et al:  Clinical trials with a live attenuated rubella virus vaccine: Cendehill 51 strain . Am J Dis Child 115:658-662, 1968;.
Prinzie A, Huygelen C, Gold J, et al:  Experimental live attenuated rubella virus vaccine: Clinical evaluation of Cendehill strain . Am J Dis Child 118:172-177, 1969;.
Kenny MT, Albright KL, Sanderson RP:  Microneutralization test for the determination of mumps antibody in VERO cells . Appl Microbiol 20:371-373, 1970;.
Kenny MT, Schell KR:  Microassay of measles and mumps virus and antibody in VERO cells . J Biol Standardization 3:291-306, 1975;.
 Collected recommendations, Public Health Service Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices . Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep 21( (suppl) ):11-14, 23-25, 1972;.
Kenny MT, Jackson JE:  Age-related immunity to measles, mumps, and rubella in Latin American and United States children . Am J Epidemiol , to be published.

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Schwarz AJF:  Preliminary tests of a highly attenuated measles vaccine . Am J Dis Child 103:386-389, 1962;.
Schwarz AJF:  Immunization against measles: Development and evaluation of a highly attenuated live measles vaccine . Ann Pediatr 202:241-252, 1964;.
Schwarz AJF, Anderson JT, Ramos-Alvarez M, et al:  Extensive clinical evaluations of a highly attenuated live measles vaccine . JAMA 199:26-30, 1967;.
Weibel RE, Stokes J Jr, Buynak EB, et al:  Live attenuated mumps-virus vaccine: 3. Clinical and serologic aspects in a field evaluation . N Engl J Med 276:245-251, 1967;.
Hilleman MR, Weibel RE, Buynak EB, et al:  Live, attenuated mumps-virus vaccine: 4. Protective efficacy as measured in a field evaluation . N Engl J Med 276:252-258, 1967;.
Hilleman MR, Buynak EB, Weibel RE, et al:  Live, attenuated mumps-virus vaccine . N Engl J Med 278:227-232, 1968;.
DuPan RM, Huygelen C, Peetermans J, et al:  Clinical trials with a live attenuated rubella virus vaccine: Cendehill 51 strain . Am J Dis Child 115:658-662, 1968;.
Prinzie A, Huygelen C, Gold J, et al:  Experimental live attenuated rubella virus vaccine: Clinical evaluation of Cendehill strain . Am J Dis Child 118:172-177, 1969;.
Kenny MT, Albright KL, Sanderson RP:  Microneutralization test for the determination of mumps antibody in VERO cells . Appl Microbiol 20:371-373, 1970;.
Kenny MT, Schell KR:  Microassay of measles and mumps virus and antibody in VERO cells . J Biol Standardization 3:291-306, 1975;.
 Collected recommendations, Public Health Service Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices . Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep 21( (suppl) ):11-14, 23-25, 1972;.
Kenny MT, Jackson JE:  Age-related immunity to measles, mumps, and rubella in Latin American and United States children . Am J Epidemiol , to be published.

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.