We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
The Pediatric Forum |

Operationally Defining "Bullying"

Jennifer L. Greif, BA; Michael J. Furlong, PhD; Gale Morrison, PhD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(11):1134-1135. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1134-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


We commend Nansel and colleagues1 for exploring the effect of bullying on youth. However, we contend that "bullying" is a very specific type of peer aggression that is not captured in the authors' definition of bullying provided to surveyed youth. Their description of bullying is attributed to Olweus,2 yet it does not sufficiently assess onffe of the fundamental components of his definition. Olweus emphasizes that acts of bullying are typically "carried out repeatedly and over time."2(p6) Although the definition provided by Nansel et al mentions that it can be considered bullying when a student is teased repeatedly, their definition does not describe bullying as a relationship with a reoccurring pattern of interactions. The concept that bullying is a relationship is one of the central characteristics that distinguish it from other types of peer aggression. By including in their definition that bullying can occur when students "say or do nasty or unpleasant things," Nansel et al are asking for youth reports of a wider range of behaviors and aggressive acts. While we recognize the importance of assessing the prevalence and effect of all types of peer aggression, there is value in a succinct and coherent definition of "bullying."



Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles