0
Commentary |

On the Standard Gamble

Frederick J. Zimmerman, PhD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(3):225-227. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.3.225.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

ONE OF THE MOST vexing yet important questions that health services researchers must collectively address is which medical care interventions should be offered to patients and in what quantities. This question is rendered more salient every year as health care consumes an ever-growing proportion of the national economic output and is allocated in ever more lopsided and arguably inequitable ways. Health care now accounts for more than 13% of the gross domestic product, and per-capita expenditures on health care in 2001 grew at 10%: a rate that far exceeded inflation.1 Most health economists agree that the reason for runaway costs is the increasing use of services and treatments, many of which are marginally effective at best. At the same time, 40 million Americans are uninsured. In effect, our society rations people rather than rationing care.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
/>
First page PDF preview

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Schematic diagram of the standard gamble showing branching of options. The respondent sets the value of x so that he or she is indifferent between the gamble and the certainty of health state 1.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Utility function. As the number of goods increases, the person's sense of well-being increases, but less than proportionately to the increase in the number of goods.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();