0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Article | Journal Club

The Limit of Viability:  A Single Regional Unit's Experience FREE

Michael M. Zayek, MD; Riley F. Trimm, MD; Charles R. Hamm, MD; Keith J. Peevy, MD; John T. Benjamin, MD; Fabien G. Eyal, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Divisions of Neonatology (Drs Zayek, Hamm, Peevy, Benjamin, and Eyal) and Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics (Dr Trimm), Department of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, Mobile.


Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(2):126-133. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.285.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective  To establish the limit between beneficial and futile management in the extremely preterm infant, born at the limit of viability, at 22 to 26 weeks of gestational age (GA).

Design  Retrospective study (11-year study period).

Setting  A tertiary regional neonatal unit.

Participants  Inborn infants (n = 841) with a birth weight of 1000 g or less and GA 2207 through 2667 weeks.

Intervention  We compared mortality and neurodevelopmental outcome between 2 periods, epoch 1 (January 1998 to June 2003) and epoch 2 (July 2003 to December 2008). For neurodevelopmental data, epoch 2 extended only to December 2006.

Main Outcome Measures  We reviewed survival rates and adverse neurodevelopmental outcome rates at 18 to 24 months' corrected age.

Results  In the past decade, survival rates continued to increase while neurodevelopmental impairment rates in the extremely preterm infant decreased. From epoch 1 to epoch 2, the increase in survival rate occurred in infants born at 22 weeks' estimated GA, from 20% to 40%, while the decrease in neurodevelopmental impairment (54% to 28%) and severe neurodevelopmental impairment (35% to 8%) occurred in infants born at 23 to 24 weeks' estimated GA.

Conclusions  Novel and aggressive neonatal therapies continue to affect neonatal outcome, mainly in infants born at the limit of viability. Our data suggest that each center offer prospective parents an assessment of the limits of viability based on their updated outcome results.

Figures in this Article

The limits of viability, considered to be between 22 and 26 weeks' gestational age (GA),13 vary widely among neonatal centers. The persistent decline in mortality in the extremely low-birth-weight infants (ELBWIs) (birth weight [BW] ≤1000 g and GA <27 weeks), seen from the 1970s to the early 1990s,4 has gradually lowered these limits. However, concerns about neurodevelopmental outcome have kept these limits broadly defined.5 Recently, it has been stated that “neonatal mortality for ELBWI has reached an unsurpassable minimum.”6(p1246) If this were the case, the limit of viability might become easier to determine. However, Itabashi et al7 recently reported that by 2006, survival rates of infants born at 22 to 23 and 24 to 25 weeks' GA had increased to 49% and 81%, respectively. Do their findings constitute a specific national exception or do they represent a universal phenomenon? This issue is particularly relevant when attempting to establish criteria for what constitutes the limits of viability.8 To determine the limit of viability in our neonatal referral center, we examined whether a similar decrease in mortality and a parallel decline in neurodevelopmental morbidity occurred in ELBWIs admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) over the past decade.

This retrospective medical record review was approved by the institutional review board at the University of South Alabama. Extremely low-birth-weight infants (BW ≤ 1000 g, GA from 22 0/7 to 26 weeks) were included if they were born alive, from January 1998 through December 2008 (n = 841), and were cared for at the tertiary regional NICU at Children's and Women's Hospital of South Alabama. Infants who died in the delivery room (DR), with or without resuscitative efforts, were also included. We excluded infants transferred to our center (outborn) and infants with multiple congenital malformations.

DATA COLLECTION

For the past 2 decades, the same 2 neonatal nurses collected maternal and infant data as part of ongoing maintenance of an electronic medical database for NICU patients. Neurodevelopmental data were collected from the Neurodevelopmental Clinic.

STUDY DESIGN

The study period was divided into 2 epochs to compare the outcomes of the preterm infant over time. Epoch 1 covered the period from January 1, 1998, through June 30, 2003, while epoch 2 covered from July 1, 2003, through December 31, 2008. Neurodevelopmental data were collected up to the age of 24 months, and thus, the second epoch extends only to December 31, 2006, for those with follow-up data.

LABOR AND DELIVERY DATA

Estimated GA (EGA) was based on last menstrual period or on first-trimester fetal ultrasonography when available. Infants were determined to be alive if cardiac activity was detected at delivery. Except for special circumstances (ie, urgent or unexpected births), parental consultation was always performed prior to delivery in infants born at less than 25 weeks' EGA and resuscitation was not initiated without parental approval. Experienced neonatal nurse practitioners or board-certified neonatologists attended all deliveries of infants born at less than 27 weeks' EGA.

NICU DATA

Cranial ultrasonography was routinely performed on days 7 and 42 and was reviewed by the same neurologist during the study period. The grading of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) was based on the Papile et al criteria.9 White matter injury (WMI) was defined by the presence of 1 of the following ultrasonography findings: grade 3 or 4 IVH or cystic periventricular leukomalacia. Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was diagnosed clinically according to the Bell criteria (≥stage II), during surgery, or from autopsy reports. Bronchopulmonary pulmonary dysplasia (BPD) was defined as the requirement for supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA). Late-onset sepsis was defined as clinical sepsis confirmed by a positive blood culture after the third day of life. Intrauterine growth restriction was defined as BW below the 10th percentile.10 Major morbidity was defined as the presence of any of the following: WMI, NEC, BPD, or retinopathy of prematurity stage 3 or more.11

NEURODEVELOPMENTAL FOLLOW-UP

Serial neurological evaluations were performed at 4, 8, 12 to 18, and 24 months' corrected age. Cerebral palsy (CP) was diagnosed when abnormal movement and posture impeded normal neuromotor function.12 Cerebral palsy was classified as mild if the infant was able to function without technological devices. Otherwise, CP was classified as moderate/severe. Infants were also evaluated at 12 to 18 months' corrected age by using the revised Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) II or III. Mental developmental index and psychomotor developmental index (BSID II)13 or cognitive score, language score, and motor score (BSID III) were determined. The BSID II was replaced by BSID III14 in January 2005. Blindness was defined as the loss of useful vision in one or both eyes. Deafness was defined as the need to use hearing aids.

Neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) was defined when the infant had any of the following: mental developmental index or cognitive/language score less than 70, psychomotor developmental index or motor score less than 70, CP, or unilateral or bilateral deafness or blindness. Severe NDI was defined by any of the following: mental developmental index or cognitive/language score less than 55, psychomotor developmental index or motor score less than 55, moderate to severe CP, bilateral deafness, or bilateral blindness.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Categorical data were analyzed using the Fisher exact test. Continuous variables were analyzed using the t test. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the effects of perinatal and postnatal factors on mortality, NICU morbidity, and NDI rates. The following 5 factors, GA, BW, sex, antenatal steroids, and singleton birth, were maintained in all models.15 In addition, factors with a P < .20 in bivariate analysis were initially included. For survival, these factors were intrauterine growth restriction, cesarean section, race, chorioamnionitis, Apgar score at 5 minutes, surfactant therapy, late-onset sepsis, pneumothorax, ligation of the ductus arteriosus, high-frequency ventilation (HFV), NEC, IVH grade 3 or 4, and epoch. For NDI, we added WMI, steroid use for BPD prevention, BPD, head circumference less than the 10th percentile at 36 weeks' PMA, days of ventilation, and days of total parenteral nutrition to the previous factors. For the final model, all added variables (for survival or for NDI) were sequentially excluded when Bayesian Information Criteria of the depleted model were less than the prior model by an absolute value more than 2.16 Measures of association in Poisson regression are expressed as relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

The distribution of all 841 inborn ELBWIs by BW and by GA is illustrated in the Figure. The rate of live-born infants admitted to the NICU increased from 92% to 95% from epoch 1 to epoch 2 (Table 1). This increase in NICU admission rate was mainly due to a decrease in mortality rate in the DR in infants born at 22 weeks' EGA with an RR of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.24-0.93) or in infants with a BW less than 500 g with an RR of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.29-0.99). For the entire study population, the survival rate increased from epoch 1 to epoch 2, from 69% to 77%. Within the various GA and BW groups, the increase in survival rate was significant at 22 and 25 weeks' EGA or at BW ranging from 500 to 599 and 700 to 799 g.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.

Dot plot of the population distribution by gestational age and birth weight. Horizontal lines represent median and interquartile range. On the left part of each gestational age is the population admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (continuous thick line) while on the right (dotted horizontal line) are infants not admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (died in the delivery room). The number of newborns is summarized by n = survived delivery room/died in delivery room.

Graphic Jump Location
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Survival Rates of All Live-Born Infants

The overall rate of NDI decreased from 51% to 32%, and the rate of severe NDI from 31% to 12%, from epoch 1 to epoch 2 (Table 2). This decrease in impairment was mainly observed at 23 and 24 weeks' EGA and in infants with BW ranging from 500 to 700 g. Table 3 lists the components of NDI. Parallel to the decline in the rate of NDI and severe NDI from epoch 1 to epoch 2, the overall rates of CP and moderate/severe CP decreased, with an RR of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07-0.36) and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.08-0.83), respectively. In the infants born at 23 to 24 weeks' EGA, the decrease in NDI seen in epoch 2 was related to decreases in bilateral deafness, CP, and motor scores less than 70.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Neurodevelopmental Morbidity
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 3. Various Components of Neurodevelopmental Impairment

Table 4 displays major prenatal and postnatal characteristics in each epoch among infants admitted to the NICU. The overall rates of chorioamnionitis, delivery by cesarean section, antenatal steroid use, HFV use, and ligation of the ductus arteriosus increased in epoch 2. Additionally, the increase in the use of HFV and ligation of the ductus arteriosus were statistically significant in all infants born at less than 25 weeks' GA. Moreover, the use of antenatal steroids and delivery by cesarean section increased in epoch 2 among all pooled infants born at less than 25 weeks' EGA (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.14-1.46 and RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01-1.40, respectively). The rate of intubation performed in the DR and the rate of surfactant therapy decreased in epoch 2 in all infants born at more than 22 weeks' GA. The incidence of intrauterine growth restriction was higher during epoch 2, especially at 24 weeks' EGA.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 4. Prenatal and Postnatal Factors by GA and Epoch

Table 5 summarizes the incidence of morbidities in each epoch among infants admitted to the NICU. Rates of late-onset sepsis, NEC, BPD, and severe retinopathy of prematurity did not differ over time, in contrast to the incidence of severe IVH and periventricular leukomalacia, which declined from 20% to 11% and 6% to 3% for all infants, respectively. In addition, a drop in the rate of “death or BPD” and an increase in the rate of survival without morbidity occurred in epoch 2.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 5. NICU Morbidities by GA and Epoch

Confounding factors included in Poisson regression are shown in Table 6. After adjusting for these factors, the increase in survival of NICU patients from epoch 1 to epoch 2 became statistically significant. Improved overall survival was associated with delivery by cesarean section, larger BW, and higher GA. Increased mortality was associated with the presence of NEC, IVH grade 3 or 4, and the use of HFV. A decrease in NDI and severe NDI occurred in infants born in epoch 2. In addition, singleton birth was associated with a decrease in severe NDI. On the other hand, an increase in NDI and severe NDI were associated with the presence of WMI and head circumference less than the 10th percentile at 36 weeks' PMA. The diagnosis of BPD was associated with an increase in NDI.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 6. Final Model for Poisson Regression

The incidence of morbidities between the lost-to-follow-up (LTFU) and the followed-up infants, by epochs, are shown in Table 7. Follow-up data were available from 370 infants (74% of survivors born up to December 2006). From epoch 1 to epoch 2, the follow-up rate at 18 to 24 months' corrected age dropped from 79% to 69%.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 7. Table 7. Morbidity in Infants LTFU vs Those Followed Up

In contrast to the concept of a leveled outcome of the ELBWIs, survival and adequate neurodevelopment of our ELBWI population continued to rise. During the second epoch, the increase in survival of the infant born at 22 weeks' EGA was mainly due to a decrease in DR mortality and was not associated with an increase in NDI. Infants born at 23 and 24 weeks' EGA during the second epoch had a decrease in NDI but did not experience an increase in survival.

There is no sharp limit of developmental age or weight at which a fetus suddenly becomes viable.17 Lucey et al18 found that it is rare for a baby weighing less than 500 g and born between 1996 and 2000 to survive. In our study, infants considered at or below the limit of viability, such as infants born at 22 weeks' EGA or infants with BW less than 500 g, had better survival rates in epoch 2, reaching 40% and 51% survival, respectively. The US Supreme Court has defined the limit of viability as the age at which a fetus becomes potentially able to live outside the mother's womb, albeit with artificial aid.19 Recently, a commonly stated definition is the fetal age at which a 50% chance of long-term survival outside its mother's womb occurs.2 In such a case, the viability in our unit, during epoch 2, has shifted down to include infants with BW more than 400 g. A recent survey of the literature on survival of infants born at 22 to 25 weeks' EGA reported that survival rates (mean to 95% upper CI limit) were 1.5% to 2.9% at 22 weeks' EGA, 40% to 59% at 23 weeks' EGA, and 57% to 72% at 24 weeks' EGA.20 Most of the studies included in this survey did not extend beyond 2000. The striking disparity with our survival rate among the very immature ELBWIs suggests either differences in management and outcome among neonatal centers21 or a trend toward continued improvement in survival beyond the 1990s.7

The improvement in survival of our most immature ELBWIs was associated with the increase in aggressive perinatal management, which is reflected by the overall rise in cesarean section rate and the use of antenatal steroids among infants born at less than 25 weeks' EGA in epoch 2. Previously, the willingness to perform a cesarean section for fetal indication at the “limit of viability” has been shown to increase the survival of these very preterm infants.22,23 Furthermore, the mortality rate in the DR among the infants born at 22 weeks' EGA and among infants with BW less than 500 g decreased in epoch 2. It would seem that the decision to initiate resuscitation in the DR occurred more frequently in epoch 2. Parental wish was always the determinant factor to initiate treatment in those extremely immature infants. We have not identified any particular reason for the increase in parental desire for a more aggressive approach in epoch 2.

Other definitions of the limit of viability include the ability to work, function, or develop adequately (Merriam-Webster dictionary). Evaluating the ability to work is difficult since it requires examining a distant past during which obstetrical and neonatal practices do not represent our current management. Neurodevelopmental assessment at 18 to 24 months' corrected age has been traditionally used as a possible predictor for infants' future abilities. Available reports on the change in NDI over time among ELBWIs are conflicting. A decrease,24,25 no improvement,26 and an increase in adverse developmental outcomes in ELBWIs27 during the 1990s have been reported. In our ELBWIs, the neurodevelopmental outcome in epoch 2 continued to improve. The decrease in adverse neurodevelopmental outcome occurred in infants born at 23 to 24 weeks' EGA. Of the various components of neurodevelopmental assessment, mental developmental index/cognitive-language score performed at this early age may not be very predictive of later cognitive outcome.28 The assessment for CP is probably a more robust parameter of neurological morbidity at this early age. The concern for many investigators5,29,30 is that the increase in survival would increase the prevalence of CP. Many studies3133 found a reduced rate of CP in spite of an increase in survival. The rate of CP among our NICU graduates dropped from epoch 1 to epoch 2. The absolute number of infants with CP decreased on average from 7 to 2 per year from epoch 1 to epoch 2.

New therapies for ELBWIs, introduced during epoch 2, could have caused the decrease in NDI. Several interventional factors, such as delayed cord clamping and use of nasal continuous airway pressure in the DR, may have affected neurodevelopmental outcome. In addition, the early use of volume expansion and vasopressors were restricted, and aluminum exposure was reduced. Because these changes started gradually and at different times during epoch 2, we were unable to ascertain their individual roles in the improved outcome of our ELBWIs. It is probable that the increased experience gained from caring for a large volume of very immature ELBWIs led to improved staff skills that profited the more mature ELBWIs.32,34 Aggressive NICU management has increased the survival rate without affecting disability rates. In epoch 2, the rate of WMI declined and the survival without major morbidity increased. A more frequent use of HFV and ligation of the ductus arteriosus may be indicators of our “aggressive” approach. As shown by others,3538 factors associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcome were the presence of BPD and head circumference less than the 10th percentile at 36 weeks' PMA. While the rate of BPD was similar for both epochs, there was an increase in the rate of head circumference less than the 10th percentile at 36 weeks' PMA among the infants born at 22 weeks' EGA in epoch 2. In spite of the latter, NDI was not different among those infants; however, there remain concerns about their future learning abilities.39

A limitation to our study is the difference in the follow-up rates between epoch 1 and epoch 2. There are conflicting reports as to whether LTFU infants represent a population with lower or higher rates of neurodevelopmental morbidities than infants who undergo follow-up.4042 Our LTFU infants had a higher incidence of BPD than the followed-up ones. Consequently, our LTFU group may have had a higher risk for NDI. Thus, we may have underestimated the incidence of NDI. On the other hand, the changes over time in NICU morbidities were similar for both the LTFU and followed-up groups. Hence, the underestimation of the incidence of NDI would be of similar magnitude for both epochs. This similarity in morbidity rate among the LTFU infants should not affect the trend for improvement in NDI rates from epoch 1 to epoch 2. For statistical analysis, assuming the worst-case scenario that all LTFU infants either died or had NDI, the combined undesirable outcome (ie, death or NDI) in infants born at less than 25 weeks' EGA would have still dropped from 76% to 57% (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.93) from epoch 1 to epoch 2.

To provide consistency and guidance to neonatal and obstetrical staff for counseling parents at the time of previability, Kaempf et al,3 in 2003, developed a guideline table for initiation of prenatal and neonatal care at 22 to 26 weeks' EGA. Considering our results, if we adopt a similar approach, we will provide NICU care to the majority of the infants born at 24 weeks' EGA, instead of the age of 26 weeks' EGA recommended by Kaempf et al, and we will not offer NICU care for infants born at less than 22 weeks' EGA, instead of less than 23 weeks' EGA. In addition, we will not recommend NICU care at 22 weeks' EGA because of the high incidence of mortality and severe neuromotor disability. It is possible that with continued gain in experience and use of “novel” approaches a further improvement may be expected.8,34

Although our findings are encouraging for infants born at or beyond 23 weeks' EGA, further studies are needed to identify reasons for the continued improvement of ELBWIs and for the vast differences in outcome among NICUs.21 In the interim, we suggest that each center offer prospective parents an assessment of the limits of viability based on the individual center's updated outcome results rather than on “national” statistics.

Correspondence: Michael M. Zayek, MD, Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, 1700 Center St, Mobile, AL 36604 (mmzayek@aol.com).

Accepted for Publication: April 16, 2010.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Zayek and Eyal. Acquisition of data: Zayek, Trimm, Hamm, Peevy, and Eyal. Analysis and interpretation of data: Zayek, Trimm, Hamm, Peevy, Benjamin, and Eyal. Drafting of the manuscript: Zayek and Eyal. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Zayek, Trimm, Hamm, Peevy, and Benjamin. Statistical analysis: Hamm and Eyal. Administrative, technical, and material support: Zayek, Hamm, Peevy, and Benjamin. Study supervision: Zayek.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Online-Only Material: This article is featured in the Archives Journal Club. Go to http://www.archpediatrics.com to download teaching PowerPoint slides.

Additional Contributions: We extend sincere appreciation to all our NICU and developmental clinic staff for their dedication to outstanding medical care.

Fellman  VHellström-Westas  LNorman  M  et al. EXPRESS Group, One-year survival of extremely preterm infants after active perinatal care in Sweden. JAMA 2009;301 (21) 2225- 2233
PubMed Link to Article
Seri  IEvans  J Limits of viability: definition of the gray zone. J Perinatol 2008;28 ((suppl 1)) S4- S8
PubMed Link to Article
Kaempf  JWTomlinson  MArduza  C  et al.  Medical staff guidelines for periviability pregnancy counseling and medical treatment of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2006;117 (1) 22- 29
PubMed Link to Article
Horbar  JDBadger  GJCarpenter  JH  et al. Members of the Vermont Oxford Network, Trends in mortality and morbidity for very low birth weight infants, 1991-1999. Pediatrics 2002;110 (1, pt 1) 143- 151
PubMed Link to Article
Lorenz  JMPaneth  NJetton  JRden Ouden  LTyson  JE Comparison of management strategies for extreme prematurity in New Jersey and the Netherlands: outcomes and resource expenditure. Pediatrics 2001;108 (6) 1269- 1274
PubMed Link to Article
Hack  M Care of preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2009;123 (4) 1246- 1247
PubMed Link to Article
Itabashi  KHoriuchi  TKusuda  S  et al.  Mortality rates for extremely low birth weight infants born in Japan in 2005. Pediatrics 2009;123 (2) 445- 450
PubMed Link to Article
Robertson  CMWatt  MJDinu  IA Outcomes for the extremely premature infant: what is new? and where are we going? Pediatr Neurol 2009;40 (3) 189- 196
PubMed Link to Article
Papile  LABurstein  JBurstein  RKoffler  H Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr 1978;92 (4) 529- 534
PubMed Link to Article
Alexander  GRHimes  JHKaufman  RBMor  JKogan  M A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87 (2) 163- 168
PubMed Link to Article
Schmidt  BAsztalos  EVRoberts  RSRobertson  CMSauve  RSWhitfield  MFTrial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP) Investigators, Impact of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, brain injury, and severe retinopathy on the outcome of extremely low-birth-weight infants at 18 months: results from the trial of indomethacin prophylaxis in preterms. JAMA 2003;289 (9) 1124- 1129
PubMed Link to Article
Rosenbaum  PPaneth  NLeviton  A  et al.  A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl 2007;1098- 14
PubMed
Bayley  N Bayley Scales of Infant Development. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX Psychological Corp1993;
Bayley  N Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX Psychological Corp2006;
Tyson  JEParikh  NALanger  JGreen  CHiggins  RDNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, Intensive care for extreme prematurity: moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med 2008;358 (16) 1672- 1681
PubMed Link to Article
Scott  JSFreese  J Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. 2nd ed. College Station, TX Stata Press Corp2006;112- 113
Moore  KPersaud  T The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology.  Philadelphia, PA Saunders2003;103
Lucey  JFRowan  CAShiono  P  et al.  Fetal infants: the fate of 4172 infants with birth weights of 401 to 500 grams—the Vermont Oxford Network experience (1996-2000). Pediatrics 2004;113 (6) 1559- 1566
PubMed Link to Article
 Roe v Wade, 410 US 113, 160, 93 S Ct 705, 730 (1973) 
Dani  CPoggi  CRomagnoli  CBertini  G Survival and major disability rate in infant born at 22-25 weeks of gestation. J Perinat Med 2009;37 (6) 599- 608
PubMed Link to Article
Vohr  BRWright  LLDusick  AM  et al. Neonatal Research Network, Center differences and outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2004;113 (4) 781- 789
PubMed Link to Article
Bottoms  SFPaul  RHIams  JD  et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units, Obstetric determinants of neonatal survival: influence of willingness to perform cesarean delivery on survival of extremely low-birth-weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176 (5) 960- 966
PubMed Link to Article
Morse  SBHaywood  JLGoldenberg  RLBronstein  JNelson  KGCarlo  WA Estimation of neonatal outcome and perinatal therapy use. Pediatrics 2000;105 (5) 1046- 1050
PubMed Link to Article
Vohr  BRWright  LLPoole  WKMcDonald  SA Neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants <32 weeks' gestation between 1993 and 1998. Pediatrics 2005;116 (3) 635- 643
PubMed Link to Article
Lefebvre  FMazurier  ETessier  R Cognitive and educational outcomes in early adulthood for infants weighing 1000 grams or less at birth. Acta Paediatr 2005;94 (6) 733- 740
PubMed Link to Article
Hintz  SRKendrick  DEVohr  BRPoole  WKHiggins  RDNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, Changes in neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months' corrected age among infants of less than 25 weeks' gestational age born in 1993-1999. Pediatrics 2005;115 (6) 1645- 1651
PubMed Link to Article
Emsley  HCWardle  SPSims  DGChiswick  MLD’Souza  SW Increased survival and deteriorating developmental outcome in 23 to 25 week old gestation infants, 1990-4 compared with 1984-9. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998;78 (2) F99- F104
PubMed Link to Article
Hack  MTaylor  HGDrotar  D  et al.  Poor predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for cognitive function of extremely low birth weight children at school age. Pediatrics 2005;116 (2) 333- 341
PubMed Link to Article
Marlow  NWolke  DBracewell  MASamara  MEPICure Study Group, Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2005;352 (1) 9- 19
PubMed Link to Article
Lorenz  JMWooliever  DEJetton  JRPaneth  N A quantitative review of mortality and developmental disability in extremely premature newborns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152 (5) 425- 435
PubMed Link to Article
Robertson  CMWatt  MJYasui  Y Changes in the prevalence of cerebral palsy for children born very prematurely within a population-based program over 30 years. JAMA 2007;297 (24) 2733- 2740
PubMed Link to Article
Doyle  LWVictorian Infant Collaborative Study Group, Evaluation of neonatal intensive care for extremely low birth weight infants in Victoria over two decades, I: effectiveness. Pediatrics 2004;113 (3, pt 1) 505- 509
PubMed Link to Article
Wilson-Costello  DFriedman  HMinich  N  et al.  Improved neurodevelopmental outcomes for extremely low birth weight infants in 2000-2002. Pediatrics 2007;119 (1) 37- 45
PubMed Link to Article
Phibbs  CSBaker  LCCaughey  ABDanielsen  BSchmitt  SKPhibbs  RH Level and volume of neonatal intensive care and mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2007;356 (21) 2165- 2175
PubMed Link to Article
O’Shea  TMGoldstein  DJdeRegnier  RASheaffer  CIRoberts  DDDillard  RG Outcome at 4 to 5 years of age in children recovered from neonatal chronic lung disease. Dev Med Child Neurol 1996;38 (9) 830- 839
PubMed
Hughes  CAO’Gorman  LAShyr  YSchork  MABozynski  MEAMcCormick  MC Cognitive performance at school age of very low birth weight infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1999;20 (1) 1- 8
PubMed Link to Article
Ehrenkranz  RADusick  AMVohr  BRWright  LLWrage  LAPoole  WK Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2006;117 (4) 1253- 1261
PubMed Link to Article
Hack  MBreslau  N Very low birth weight infants: effects of brain growth during infancy on intelligence quotient at 3 years of age. Pediatrics 1986;77 (2) 196- 202
PubMed
Stathis  SLO’Callaghan  MHarvey  JRogers  Y Head circumference in ELBW babies is associated with learning difficulties and cognition but not ADHD in the school-aged child. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999;41 (6) 375- 380
PubMed Link to Article
Aylward  GPHatcher  RPStripp  BGustafson  NFLeavitt  LA Who goes and who stays: subject loss in a multicenter, longitudinal follow-up study. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1985;6 (1) 3- 8
PubMed Link to Article
Tin  WFritz  SWariyar  UHey  E Outcome of very preterm birth: children reviewed with ease at 2 years differ from those followed up with difficulty. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998;79 (2) F83- F87
PubMed Link to Article
Castro  LYolton  KHaberman  B  et al.  Bias in reported neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight survivors. Pediatrics 2004;114 (2) 404- 410
PubMed Link to Article

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.

Dot plot of the population distribution by gestational age and birth weight. Horizontal lines represent median and interquartile range. On the left part of each gestational age is the population admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (continuous thick line) while on the right (dotted horizontal line) are infants not admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (died in the delivery room). The number of newborns is summarized by n = survived delivery room/died in delivery room.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 1. Survival Rates of All Live-Born Infants
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 2. Neurodevelopmental Morbidity
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 3. Various Components of Neurodevelopmental Impairment
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 4. Prenatal and Postnatal Factors by GA and Epoch
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 5. NICU Morbidities by GA and Epoch
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 6. Final Model for Poisson Regression
Table Graphic Jump LocationTable 7. Table 7. Morbidity in Infants LTFU vs Those Followed Up

References

Fellman  VHellström-Westas  LNorman  M  et al. EXPRESS Group, One-year survival of extremely preterm infants after active perinatal care in Sweden. JAMA 2009;301 (21) 2225- 2233
PubMed Link to Article
Seri  IEvans  J Limits of viability: definition of the gray zone. J Perinatol 2008;28 ((suppl 1)) S4- S8
PubMed Link to Article
Kaempf  JWTomlinson  MArduza  C  et al.  Medical staff guidelines for periviability pregnancy counseling and medical treatment of extremely premature infants. Pediatrics 2006;117 (1) 22- 29
PubMed Link to Article
Horbar  JDBadger  GJCarpenter  JH  et al. Members of the Vermont Oxford Network, Trends in mortality and morbidity for very low birth weight infants, 1991-1999. Pediatrics 2002;110 (1, pt 1) 143- 151
PubMed Link to Article
Lorenz  JMPaneth  NJetton  JRden Ouden  LTyson  JE Comparison of management strategies for extreme prematurity in New Jersey and the Netherlands: outcomes and resource expenditure. Pediatrics 2001;108 (6) 1269- 1274
PubMed Link to Article
Hack  M Care of preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2009;123 (4) 1246- 1247
PubMed Link to Article
Itabashi  KHoriuchi  TKusuda  S  et al.  Mortality rates for extremely low birth weight infants born in Japan in 2005. Pediatrics 2009;123 (2) 445- 450
PubMed Link to Article
Robertson  CMWatt  MJDinu  IA Outcomes for the extremely premature infant: what is new? and where are we going? Pediatr Neurol 2009;40 (3) 189- 196
PubMed Link to Article
Papile  LABurstein  JBurstein  RKoffler  H Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr 1978;92 (4) 529- 534
PubMed Link to Article
Alexander  GRHimes  JHKaufman  RBMor  JKogan  M A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87 (2) 163- 168
PubMed Link to Article
Schmidt  BAsztalos  EVRoberts  RSRobertson  CMSauve  RSWhitfield  MFTrial of Indomethacin Prophylaxis in Preterms (TIPP) Investigators, Impact of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, brain injury, and severe retinopathy on the outcome of extremely low-birth-weight infants at 18 months: results from the trial of indomethacin prophylaxis in preterms. JAMA 2003;289 (9) 1124- 1129
PubMed Link to Article
Rosenbaum  PPaneth  NLeviton  A  et al.  A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl 2007;1098- 14
PubMed
Bayley  N Bayley Scales of Infant Development. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX Psychological Corp1993;
Bayley  N Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX Psychological Corp2006;
Tyson  JEParikh  NALanger  JGreen  CHiggins  RDNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, Intensive care for extreme prematurity: moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med 2008;358 (16) 1672- 1681
PubMed Link to Article
Scott  JSFreese  J Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. 2nd ed. College Station, TX Stata Press Corp2006;112- 113
Moore  KPersaud  T The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology.  Philadelphia, PA Saunders2003;103
Lucey  JFRowan  CAShiono  P  et al.  Fetal infants: the fate of 4172 infants with birth weights of 401 to 500 grams—the Vermont Oxford Network experience (1996-2000). Pediatrics 2004;113 (6) 1559- 1566
PubMed Link to Article
 Roe v Wade, 410 US 113, 160, 93 S Ct 705, 730 (1973) 
Dani  CPoggi  CRomagnoli  CBertini  G Survival and major disability rate in infant born at 22-25 weeks of gestation. J Perinat Med 2009;37 (6) 599- 608
PubMed Link to Article
Vohr  BRWright  LLDusick  AM  et al. Neonatal Research Network, Center differences and outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2004;113 (4) 781- 789
PubMed Link to Article
Bottoms  SFPaul  RHIams  JD  et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units, Obstetric determinants of neonatal survival: influence of willingness to perform cesarean delivery on survival of extremely low-birth-weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176 (5) 960- 966
PubMed Link to Article
Morse  SBHaywood  JLGoldenberg  RLBronstein  JNelson  KGCarlo  WA Estimation of neonatal outcome and perinatal therapy use. Pediatrics 2000;105 (5) 1046- 1050
PubMed Link to Article
Vohr  BRWright  LLPoole  WKMcDonald  SA Neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants <32 weeks' gestation between 1993 and 1998. Pediatrics 2005;116 (3) 635- 643
PubMed Link to Article
Lefebvre  FMazurier  ETessier  R Cognitive and educational outcomes in early adulthood for infants weighing 1000 grams or less at birth. Acta Paediatr 2005;94 (6) 733- 740
PubMed Link to Article
Hintz  SRKendrick  DEVohr  BRPoole  WKHiggins  RDNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, Changes in neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months' corrected age among infants of less than 25 weeks' gestational age born in 1993-1999. Pediatrics 2005;115 (6) 1645- 1651
PubMed Link to Article
Emsley  HCWardle  SPSims  DGChiswick  MLD’Souza  SW Increased survival and deteriorating developmental outcome in 23 to 25 week old gestation infants, 1990-4 compared with 1984-9. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998;78 (2) F99- F104
PubMed Link to Article
Hack  MTaylor  HGDrotar  D  et al.  Poor predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for cognitive function of extremely low birth weight children at school age. Pediatrics 2005;116 (2) 333- 341
PubMed Link to Article
Marlow  NWolke  DBracewell  MASamara  MEPICure Study Group, Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2005;352 (1) 9- 19
PubMed Link to Article
Lorenz  JMWooliever  DEJetton  JRPaneth  N A quantitative review of mortality and developmental disability in extremely premature newborns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152 (5) 425- 435
PubMed Link to Article
Robertson  CMWatt  MJYasui  Y Changes in the prevalence of cerebral palsy for children born very prematurely within a population-based program over 30 years. JAMA 2007;297 (24) 2733- 2740
PubMed Link to Article
Doyle  LWVictorian Infant Collaborative Study Group, Evaluation of neonatal intensive care for extremely low birth weight infants in Victoria over two decades, I: effectiveness. Pediatrics 2004;113 (3, pt 1) 505- 509
PubMed Link to Article
Wilson-Costello  DFriedman  HMinich  N  et al.  Improved neurodevelopmental outcomes for extremely low birth weight infants in 2000-2002. Pediatrics 2007;119 (1) 37- 45
PubMed Link to Article
Phibbs  CSBaker  LCCaughey  ABDanielsen  BSchmitt  SKPhibbs  RH Level and volume of neonatal intensive care and mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 2007;356 (21) 2165- 2175
PubMed Link to Article
O’Shea  TMGoldstein  DJdeRegnier  RASheaffer  CIRoberts  DDDillard  RG Outcome at 4 to 5 years of age in children recovered from neonatal chronic lung disease. Dev Med Child Neurol 1996;38 (9) 830- 839
PubMed
Hughes  CAO’Gorman  LAShyr  YSchork  MABozynski  MEAMcCormick  MC Cognitive performance at school age of very low birth weight infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1999;20 (1) 1- 8
PubMed Link to Article
Ehrenkranz  RADusick  AMVohr  BRWright  LLWrage  LAPoole  WK Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2006;117 (4) 1253- 1261
PubMed Link to Article
Hack  MBreslau  N Very low birth weight infants: effects of brain growth during infancy on intelligence quotient at 3 years of age. Pediatrics 1986;77 (2) 196- 202
PubMed
Stathis  SLO’Callaghan  MHarvey  JRogers  Y Head circumference in ELBW babies is associated with learning difficulties and cognition but not ADHD in the school-aged child. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999;41 (6) 375- 380
PubMed Link to Article
Aylward  GPHatcher  RPStripp  BGustafson  NFLeavitt  LA Who goes and who stays: subject loss in a multicenter, longitudinal follow-up study. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1985;6 (1) 3- 8
PubMed Link to Article
Tin  WFritz  SWariyar  UHey  E Outcome of very preterm birth: children reviewed with ease at 2 years differ from those followed up with difficulty. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998;79 (2) F83- F87
PubMed Link to Article
Castro  LYolton  KHaberman  B  et al.  Bias in reported neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight survivors. Pediatrics 2004;114 (2) 404- 410
PubMed Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 6

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections