Book Reviews and Other Media |

Autism’s False Prophets: Bad Science, Risky Medicine, and the Search for a Cure

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(4):396. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.13.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In 1998, Pandora's box was opened. Andrew Wakefield, a British gastroenterologist, revealed to the media his article linking the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine with autism. From this singular moment a movement was born. Despite millions in research, no number of articles refuting causality between vaccines and autism has been able to quell this myth. This is a problem that practicing physicians and nurses encounter every day.

Wading into this stormy sea of controversy is Paul Offit, with his book Autism's False Prophets. Offit is the chief of Infectious Diseases at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and no stranger to the world of vaccines, having been involved in the development of RotaTeq (Merck, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey), a rotavirus vaccine licensed by the Food and Drug Administration in 2006. In addition to his scientific efforts, he has led a charge nationally against the unseen powers that have raised unfounded suspicions against these valuable medicines. This fight has not been without personal cost. Offit has received death threats, been granted Federal Bureau of Investigation security detail, and even had threats made against his children.


Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.