Editorial |

The Difference Between Efficacy and Effectiveness Research in Studying Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Mark L. Wolraich, MD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153(12):1220-1221. doi:10.1001/archpedi.153.12.1220.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


THE STUDY by Zito and colleagues1 in this issue of the ARCHIVES is a welcome first step in understanding the clinical use of stimulant medications in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The controversy about treatment with methylphenidate hydrochloride raised in the popular press2,3 continues despite the fact that ADHD and its treatment with stimulant medications and psychosocial interventions have been rigorously studied to a greater degree than any other mental disorder.4,5 The continued concern is the perception that too many children are being treated with stimulant medication.6 The evidence to date suggests that, while there may be inappropriate treatment with methylphenidate as implied by the wide variation in physician and local prescription rates,7 the variations include both undertreatment and overtreatment such that the prevalence of stimulant medication use does not exceed the most commonly accepted prevalence rates for the disorder.8,9 The study by Zito et al further substantiates these findings in that while they found a considerable increase in the number of children treated, the treatment prevalence within the practices was still within the most frequently cited prevalence range.8,9 It is actually similar to prevalence rates in a group of Iowa pediatricians and family practitioners from 1987.10

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview


Place holder to copy figure label and caption

Mark L. Wolraich, MD

Graphic Jump Location




Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles