We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Research Letter |

Association of Oxygen Target and Growth Status With Increased Mortality in Small for Gestational Age Infants Further Analysis of the Surfactant, Positive Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Randomized Trial

Michele C. Walsh, MD, MSc1; Juliann M. Di Fiore, BSEE1; Richard J. Martin, MD1; Marie Gantz, PhD2; Waldemar A. Carlo, MD3; Neil Finer, MD4
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland Ohio
2RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
3Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama, Birmingham
4Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego
JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(3):292-294. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3794.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


This post hoc study assesses whether there is an association between oxygen target and growth status.

The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Surfactant, Positive Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Randomized Trial (SUPPORT)1 compared the effect of oxygen saturation targets on retinopathy of prematurity or death among infants born at 24 to 27 weeks’ gestational age. One thousand three hundred sixteen infants were randomized to lower (85%-89%) vs higher (91%-95%) target oxygen saturation. Rates of severe retinopathy of prematurity or death were not different (28.3% and 32.1%, respectively; relative risk with lower target, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76-1.06; P = .21). Lower oxygen targets reduced severe retinopathy of prematurity among survivors (8.6% vs 17.9%; relative risk, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73; P < .001). However, an unanticipated and unexplained finding was increased mortality in the lower saturation group (19.9% vs 16.2%; relative risk, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01-1.60; P = .04). The study included neurodevelopmental assessment at 2 years of age; at that assessment we noted a disproportionate loss of small for gestational age (SGA) infants. This observation promoted us to assess whether there was an interaction between oxygen target group and growth status.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves for Small and Appropriate for Gestational Age Infants in the Surfactant, Positive Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Randomized Trial by Randomized Oxygen Saturation Strata

A, Small for gestational age infants randomized to the lower oxygen target (shown in tan) had significantly poorer survival than those randomized to the higher oxygen target (shown in blue). B, Appropriate for gestational age infants had similar mortality between the 2 oxygen strata.

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles