We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Review |

Prognostic Factors for Poor Cognitive Development in Children Born Very Preterm or With Very Low Birth Weight A Systematic Review

Louise Linsell, BSc, MSc1; Reem Malouf, MSc, MD1; Joan Morris, MA, MSc, PhD2; Jennifer J. Kurinczuk, BSc, MBChB, MSc, MD1; Neil Marlow, BA, MBBS, MRCP, MD3
[+] Author Affiliations
1National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England
2Centre for Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, England
3Institute of Women’s Health, University College London, London, England
JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(12):1162-1172. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2175.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  Cognitive delay is the most common form of impairment among children born very preterm (VPT) at 32 weeks or less or with very low birth weight (VLBW) of 1250 g or less. It is important to identify factors that are robust predictors of long-term outcome because the ability to predict future prognosis will assist in health care and educational service planning and provision.

Objective  To identify prognostic factors for poor cognitive development in children born VPT or with VLBW.

Evidence Review  A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PyscINFO databases to identify studies published between January 1, 1990, and June 1, 2014, reporting multivariable prediction models for neurodevelopment in VPT or VLBW children. Thirty-one studies comprising 98 risk factor models for cognitive outcome were identified. Two independent reviewers extracted key information on study design, outcome definition, risk factor selection, model development, and reporting and conducted a risk-of-bias assessment.

Findings  There was evidence that male sex, nonwhite race/ethnicity, lower level of parental education, and lower birth weight were predictive of global cognitive impairment in children younger than 5 years. In older children, only the influence of parental education was sustained. Male sex was also predictive of language impairment in early infancy, but not in middle childhood. Gestational age was a poor predictor of cognitive outcome, probably because of a reduced discriminatory power in cohorts restricted to a narrow gestational age range. The prognostic value of neonatal brain injury was unclear; however, studies adopted mixed strategies for managing children with physical or neurosensory disability.

Conclusions and Relevance  The influence of perinatal risk factors on cognitive development of VPT or VLBW children appears to diminish over time as environmental factors become more important. It is difficult to isolate cognitive outcomes from motor and neurosensory impairment, and the strategy for dealing with untestable children has implications for risk prediction.

Figures in this Article


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.
Flow Diagram

aReviewed in this article.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.
Risk-of-Bias Assessment

Shown are 31 studies comprising 98 risk factor models for cognitive outcome.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.
Evidence Synthesis of Risk Factors for Global Cognitive Impairment in Children Born Very Preterm or With Very Low Birth Weight

Prognostic factors are presented if significant (P < .05) in the final model of at least 1 study with low-to-moderate risk of bias and entered into the final model of at least 3 studies (across all ages). A through T indicate study identifiers listed in Table 1 and Table 2 (* denotes an extremely preterm cohort); SES, socioeconomic status.

aNonwhite (B and E), black (C), or Afro-Caribbean (G).

bIntraventricular hemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia (B, C, D, F, H, I, L, M, O, S, and T), periventricular leukomalacia or ventricular dilatation (R), intraventricular hemorrhage grades 2 to 4 (A), parenchymal lesion (Q), intraventricular hemorrhage grades 1 to 3, echodensities, ventricular dilatation, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, or intraparenchymal hemorrhage (N).

cAny high-frequency (B), any mechanical ventilation (J), or mechanical ventilation days (C, F, I, Q, S, and T).

dPerforated necrotizing enterocolitis (A), necrotizing enterocolitis stages 2 to 3 (C and F), surgical or radiograph diagnosed (J), bowel perforation or necrotizing enterocolitis (T), or not specified (H, L, and N).

eOxygen requirement at 36 weeks’ gestational age (B, D, F, G, J, L, M, N, O, and R) or not specified (H and P).

fMore than 24 hours before labor (G) or not specified (A and F).

gStage 3 to 4 (I, K, and L), at least stage 3 with laser therapy (F), or stage 4 to 5 or treatment with cryotherapy or laser therapy (O).

hIncrease in head circumference from discharge to 5 years (I), occipitofrontal circumference 7-year centile (Q), or increase in head circumference less than 6 mm per week (T).

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

2 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles