We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation |

Ethnic, Racial, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Retinoblastoma

Bao Truong, MD1,2; Adam L. Green, MD1,2; Paola Friedrich, MD, MPH1,2; Karina B. Ribeiro, DDS, PhD3; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, MD1,2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts
2Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
3Department of Collective Health, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(12):1096-1104. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2360.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  Most children with retinoblastoma in the United States are diagnosed as having a large intraocular tumor burden that requires intensive ocular-salvage treatment or enucleation.

Objective  To investigate the effect of socioeconomic status, race, and ethnicity on the extent of disease and the outcomes of retinoblastoma.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A population-based review of 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries. From January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2010, 830 cases of retinoblastoma were recorded for children aged 0 to 9 years. Data were collected and analyzed from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2010, with the last follow-up on December 31, 2010.

Exposures  County-based socioeconomic variables analyzed included poverty level, educational attainment, language isolation, crowding, unemployment, and percentage of immigrants.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Extent of disease, ocular outcome, and children’s survival.

Results  Of the 830 individuals included, Hispanic children had a higher percentage of extraocular disease (86 of 261 [33.0%] vs 102 of 510 non-Hispanic children [20.0%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.97 [95% CI, 1.38-2.79]). The percentage of extraocular cases was also higher in counties with the following low socioeconomic status indicators: higher vs lower poverty status (115 of 413 [27.8%] vs 73 of 358 [20.4%]; OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.06-2.14); lower vs higher educational attainment (115 of 400 [28.7%] vs 73 of 371 [19.7%]; OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.16-2.34); higher vs lower levels of crowding (124 of 398 [31.2%] vs 64 of 373 [17.2%]; OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.53-3.13); higher vs lower unemployment (119 of 411 [28.9%] vs 69 of 360 [19.2%]; OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.21-2.45); higher vs lower language isolation (117 of 388 [30.2%] vs 71 of 383 [18.5%]; OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.34-2.70); and higher vs lower percentage of immigrants (109 of 386 [28.2%] vs 79 of 385 [20.5%]; OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.08-2.16). Higher rates of enucleation were associated with low educational attainment (265 of 401 [66.1%] vs 309 of 421 [73.4%]; OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.04-1.93), a higher level of crowding (316 of 416 [76.0%] vs 258 of 406 [63.5%]; OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.32-2.48), and Hispanic origin (202 of 271 [74.5%]; OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.01-1.98). Relative survival at 5 years was lower among black compared with non-Hispanic white children (92.7% vs 99.2%; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance  Significant disparities exist in the care and outcomes of children with retinoblastoma. A low socioeconomic status negatively affects disease extent and ocular outcomes, presumably by limiting access to primary and cancer-directed care. Hispanic children in particular have more advanced disease and higher rates of enucleation.





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

2 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections