We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

The Broad Approach of a Structural Intervention Study and the Lack of Effect Detection Target Population and Sampling Issues

William J. Woods, PhD1; Lance M. Pollack, PhD1; Diane Binson, PhD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco
JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(8):790. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1369.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor Ellen et al1 reported on a study offering a wide range of structural changes targeting a broad representation of youth at risk for human immunodeficiency virus. It was disappointing that the evaluation found no significant effect. However, it is possible that this broad approach itself contributed to the failure. In an evaluation of a potential structural effect of human immunodeficiency virus testing on premises in a gay bathhouse environment,2 we found a significant difference in the level of reported unprotected anal intercourse. When testing was offered in the bathhouse, there were significantly fewer reports of unprotected anal intercourse compared with when testing was not offered.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





August 1, 2015
Jonathan M. Ellen, MD; Lauren Greenberg, MPH; James Korelitz, PhD
1All Children’s Hospital Johns Hopkins Medicine, St Petersburg, Florida
2Westat, Rockville, Maryland
JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(8):790-791. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1375.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...