We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Implications for Primary Care of Diabetes and Impaired Fasting Glucose Prevalence in Adolescents

Arlan L. Rosenbloom, MD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160(5):550-552. doi:10.1001/archpedi.160.5.550.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In his article in this issue, Duncan1 estimates the prevalence for type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from self-reports by 4370 adolescents aged 12 to 19 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, and frequency of impaired fasting glucose in a tested subsample of subjects. A fundamental problem in interpreting the diabetes prevalence data is the case definition of T1DM and of T2DM. During the past several decades, we have gone from classifying the main forms of diabetes by age group (juvenile onset vs maturity onset) to differentiating by treatment (insulin-dependent vs noninsulin-dependent) to the contemporary separation by etiology.2 Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a disease predominantly of autoimmune-mediated insulin deficiency, whereas T2DM results from a combination of insulin resistance and inadequate islet cell capacity to meet the increased insulin demands. The case definition in this study, which lacks validation from medical records, harks back to classification by treatment; those who reported using insulin were considered to have T1DM and those who reported that they were not using insulin were considered to have T2DM. The concern about case definition based on insulin use is exemplified by the recognition that pediatric endocrinologists treat approximately 50% of their patients who have T2DM with insulin, either as monotherapy or in conjunction with oral hypoglycemic agents. Two of 10 subjects in Duncan's study were taking insulin and thus classified as having T1DM, but they were also taking oral agents, making it likely that they had T2DM. Only 1 of the 8 subjects who self-reported diabetes and that they were not taking insulin reported that they were taking an oral hypoglycemic agent. The diagnosis of diabetes is therefore questionable in 7 of these subjects because only about 10% of pediatric patients with T2DM can control their disease for more than a brief period with lifestyle change alone.3,4 These concerns are magnified when the small numbers of purported subjects with diabetes are stratified by ethnicity for each diabetes type, resulting in wide 95% confidence intervals for the estimates.1

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Diabetes, Foot Ulcer

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy