We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

The State Children's Health Insurance Program Effective but Vulnerable

Paul H. Wise, MD, MPH
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(12):1175-1176. doi:10.1001/archpedi.156.12.1175.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


CLINICIANS DO not need studies to convince them that insurance coverage makes a difference. However, many policy makers do. The article by Slifkin et al1 in this issue of the ARCHIVES articulates just such a fundamental message through a purposeful evaluation of a North Carolina child health insurance plan supported by the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP). The SCHIP was established by Congress in 1997 to provide funds for state efforts to provide child health insurance for families with incomes too high to be eligible for Medicaid yet too low to realistically afford private insurance. In the analysis of the North Carolina program, parental surveys were conducted soon after a child's enrollment in the plan and then again a year later. Although the authors report a number of interesting results, of central importance was the finding that the percentage of children with unmet health care needs fell dramatically after entering the program. Parents reported that the program greatly enhanced access to physicians, eyeglasses, and prescription drugs. Few in the program reported that their children's health care needs were going unmet. These are important findings that speak directly to one of the principal questions regarding SCHIP: can such a health insurance plan reduce barriers to recommended care for children? This study suggests that, at least for the North Carolina case, the answer is yes.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
PubMed Articles