0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
The Pediatric Forum |

Congenital Syphilis in Newborn Infants—Reply

Virginia A. Moyer, MD MPH; Robert Yetman, MD; Deborah Parks, RN MSN; Virginia Schneider, PA-C; Joseph Garcia-Prats, MD; Timothy Cooper, MD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(10):1041. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

In reply

We appreciate the careful reading by Drs Rawstron and Bromberg of our article on the topic of the usefulness of long-bone radiographs in diagnosing active congenital syphilis.1 They are correct in pointing out a typographical error in the Table; in fact, there are 2 errors in the Table, and 1 in the text. With regard to their second, third, and fifth concerns, all of our patients were evaluated as recommended by published guidelines (including cerebrospinal fluid evaluations); data on the results of other tests are not reported because this was not a study of the wisdom of performing lumbar punctures or any other test. This was a study of the wisdom of ordering long-bone radiographs in the evaluation of congenital syphilis. If they are interested, several articles have been published on the use of lumbar punctures in the evaluation of congenital syphilis. Their fourth and sixth concerns are most worrisome to us, as they indicate that we did not make our point sufficiently clear. Rawstron and Bromberg assume in their comments that abnormal long-bone films are diagnostic of active congenital syphilis; that they are not is the point of our article. As has been previously demonstrated and is confirmed by our data, long-bone films are nonspecific for syphilis. An abnormal film does not mean that an infant has congenital syphilis, and a normal film does not mean that an infant does not have congenital syphilis. Further, even when positive, the long-bone films do not have any prognostic significance. As a result, knowing the result of the long-bone films will not help us to detect infants with congenital syphilis and will not help us decide what treatment is needed. Parents expect their child's pediatrician to practice fact-based medicine. We hope that our data will provide pediatricians with data to decide on diagnosis and appropriate treatment, and that patients will therefore be subjected only to the most necessary and useful tests and procedures. The resources that are spent on long-bone films might be better spent on intensive follow-up, during which the conditions of some infants can be definitively diagnosed. This would, in fact, represent the "best attempt" to make the diagnosis given current technology. We and many others await refinement of such tests as immunoglobulin M and perhaps even polymerase chain reaction so that we can satisfy our intellectual and scientific curiosity with accurate information and better choose the infants who truly need treatment.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();