Editorial |

Information Overload? Read 3 of These and You Won't Have to Call in the Morning

Susan Radius, PhD; Alain Joffe, MD, MPH
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(7):622-623. doi:10.1001/archpedi.152.7.622.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


THERE COMES a time for all pediatricians when they consult with parents and tell them it's time to let their adolescent go. The adolescent is entering a world of independent experiences that the parent can no longer share or originate. Instead, the parent must trust the decisions of the teenager, while continuing to ask probing questions to establish that everything is all right. Without extending the analogy to ridiculous extremes, the same phenomenon—of letting go, of relinquishing control—is something to recognize when we evaluate research in general, and clinical trials in particular. The rate at which new information is now available surpasses our wildest dreams. Whether you accept claims that our knowledge base doubles in 5 months or 5 years, it is clear that the sheer mass of facts stemming from research and clinical trials is growing to mountainous proportions. It is literally impossible for most clinicians to acquire, let alone process, that amount of information. At the same time, we know that the number of journals is increasing, as is the very real cost of subscribing to them. In short, formidable challenges stand in the way of ready access to the full breadth of published work that may well affect our care of patients. If one adds to the available pool of clinical trials those pursuits that never reach publication, or that circulate informally among collegial groups, access is that much more difficult, if not impossible.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics