We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
The Pediatric Forum |

Hegel, the Nazis, and Child Euthanasia

Eric v. d. Luft, PhD, MLS
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(6):606. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The article by Parent and Shevell in the January 1998 ARCHIVES1 is well researched, well written, and important to read. Nevertheless, it contains a manifest falsehood that must be set right. On page 85, the authors assert: "Under the Nazis, the prevailing ethic was a Hegelian one, in which ‘ends justified means'." Delete the reference to Hegel, and the sentence would be true.

As a trained philosopher who wrote his doctoral dissertation on Hegel, a former secretary and executive councillor of the Hegel Society of America, and a former associate editor of its journal, The Owl of Minerva, I can state with certainty that to attribute any such ethic to G. W. F. Hegel (1770-1831) is completely erroneous. In fact, I can think of no major philosopher for whom ends would justify means. Even Machiavelli or Hobbes would temper that attitude somewhat. It typifies practitioners of politics such as Hitler, Lenin, and Stalin rather than scholars or theorists of ethics and political philosophy such as Hegel, a constitutional monarchist and liberal republican who believed in the rule of law and in the preservation and enhancement of human rights and freedoms. Lenin even claimed that he had to "turn Hegel upside down" to incorporate Hegelian dialectic into his "ends justifying means" revolution.



Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Care at the Close of Life: Evidence and Experience
Responding to Requests for Physician-Assisted Suicide: "These Are Uncharted Waters for Both of Us…"

Care at the Close of Life: Evidence and Experience
Pain Crisis Management and Institutional Resources