0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation | Journal Club

Nonsterile Glove Use in Addition to Hand Hygiene to Prevent Late-Onset Infection in Preterm Infants:  Randomized Clinical Trial

David A. Kaufman, MD1; Amy Blackman, RN1; Mark R. Conaway, PhD2; Robert A. Sinkin, MD, MPH1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville
2Division of Translational Research and Applied Statistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville
JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(10):909-916. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.953.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  Late-onset infections commonly occur in extremely preterm infants and are associated with high rates of mortality and neurodevelopmental impairment. Hand hygiene alone does not always achieve the desired clean hands, as microorganisms are still present more than 50% of the time. We hypothesize that glove use after hand hygiene may further decrease these infections.

Objective  To determine if nonsterile glove use after hand hygiene before all patient and intravenous catheter contact, compared with hand hygiene alone, prevents late-onset infections in preterm infants.

Design, Settings, and Participants  A prospective, single-center, clinical, randomized trial was conducted in infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit who weighed less than 1000 g and/or had a gestational age of less than 29 weeks and were less than 8 days old. There were 175 eligible infants, of which 120 were enrolled during a 30-month period from December 8, 2008, to June 20, 2011.

Interventions  Infants were randomly assigned to receive care with nonsterile gloves after hand hygiene (group A) or care after hand hygiene alone (group B) before all patient and intravenous line (central and peripheral) contact. Study intervention was continued while patients had central or peripheral venous access.

Main Outcomes and Measures  One or more episodes of late-onset (>72 hours of age) infection in the bloodstream, urinary tract, or cerebrospinal fluid or necrotizing enterocolitis.

Results  The 2 groups were similar in baseline demographic characteristics. Late-onset invasive infection or necrotizing enterocolitis occurred in 32% of infants (19 of 60) in group A compared with 45% of infants (27 of 60) in group B (difference, −12%; 95% CI, −28% to 6%; P = .13). In group A compared with group B, there were 53% fewer gram-positive bloodstream infections (15% [9 of 60] vs 32% [19 of 60]; difference, −17%; 95% CI, −31% to −1%; P = .03) and 64% fewer central line–associated bloodstream infections (3.4 vs 9.4 per 1000 central line days; ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.81; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance  Glove use after hand hygiene prior to patient and line contact is associated with fewer gram-positive bloodstream infections and possible central line–associated bloodstream infections in preterm infants. This readily implementable infection control measure may result in decreased infections in high-risk preterm infants.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01729000

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.
Flowchart of Screening, Randomization, and Analysis

A total of 124 infants were randomized; 4 infants required gown and glove contact precautions for their entire hospitalization and were unable to be assigned to their study group.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.
Difference in Proportions Between Groups With 95% CIs

The difference was obtained by subtracting values for the group that received care after hand hygiene alone from those of the group who received care with gloves after hand hygiene. Values to the left of 0 indicate lower proportions with glove use after hand hygiene; values to the right of 0 indicate lower proportions with hand hygiene alone. BSI indicates bloodstream infection; CoNS, coagulase-negative Staphylococci; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; and UTI, urinary tract infection.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME


You need to register in order to view this quiz.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 1

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();