We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Call for Papers on Implementation Science in Pediatric Health Care FREE

Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH1
[+] Author Affiliations
1University of Washington, The Child Health Institute, Seattle
JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(8):705. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.976.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

No one needs a reminder of the cost to taxpayers and consumers for health care each year, both here in the United States and abroad. Legislators and taxpayers are also concerned about the return on investment in health care research, and whether this investment is furthering or even hindering the effort to achieve 3 objectives that are frequently in conflict with each other: improving quality, access, and cost-effectiveness.

Much evidence has accumulated over the last couple of decades that the time between accumulation of evidence that an intervention or therapy does or does not work and its incorporation or removal from practice is measured in years if not decades. Simply implementing what we know works and desisting from what we know does not would have an enormous impact on health and health care. Investigators, clinicians, administrators, and government agencies have learned that the translation of evidence to policy and practice is far from simple and never assured. A new field of inquiry, implementation science, has developed that recognizes and addresses the multitude of gaps that impede evidence-based interventions from producing optimal health outcomes. These knowledge and practice gaps include:

  • “Research-to-program” gaps, which exist when research evidence is not adequately or appropriately considered and integrated in the development of health outcomes.

  • “Research-to-policy” gaps, which exist when research evidence is not adequately or appropriately considered and integrated in the development of health policy.

Implementation science is the study of methods to promote the integration of research findings and evidence into health care policy and practice. It seeks to understand the behavior of health care professionals and other stakeholders as a key variable in the sustainable uptake, adoption, and implementation of evidence-based practice. It also examines system issues for barriers to implementation and new methods to overcome these. A newer component of this science is starting to focus on deimplementation, the discontinuance of things proven not to be effective or safe.

JAMA Pediatrics will devote an entire issue in spring 2015 to implementation science research in child health, both in the United States and abroad, in high-resource as well as low- and middle-resource countries. As pediatric care becomes increasingly focused on children, adolescents, and young adults with chronic illness, who account for the largest part of our health care expenditures, our hospital beds, and our specialty care, implementation research for these children and adolescents is of particular interest. Research on how to implement evidence-based practice is needed at all levels of care: the intensive care unit, the emergency department, the wards, the clinic, the home, and sites in the community including schools and neighborhoods. Implementation can be in all forms: from practice to policy.

We are interested in rigorous studies that test hypotheses about methods to close these gaps, to translate research in those steps between efficacy trials and population health. This will include randomized clinical trials including cluster randomized clinical trials, adaptive research designs, carefully conducted time series analyses, longitudinal studies, interrupted time series, and qualitative research. We are interested as well in cost-effectiveness analyses and systematic reviews on the most effective strategies to change professional behavior; create informed, activated consumers; and guide the behavior of administrators and health care organizations and policy makers.

Manuscripts submitted before October 2014 will have the best chance of acceptance. Full details on submission and author guidelines are available at http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com.


Corresponding Author: Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH, University of Washington, The Child Health Institute, JAMA Pediatrics, 6200 NE 74th St, 120B, Seattle, WA 98115-8160 (fpr@u.washington.edu).

Published Online: June 9, 2014. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.976.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Sexual Abuse, Child

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Pretest Probabilities and Likelihood Ratios for Clinical Findings