0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Research Letter |

Weight Labeling and Obesity: A Longitudinal Study of Girls Aged 10 to 19 Years FREE

Jeffrey M. Hunger, MA1; A. Janet Tomiyama, PhD2
[+] Author Affiliations
1University of California, Santa Barbara
2University of California, Los Angeles
JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(6):579-580. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.122.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Anti-obesity efforts that rely on stigmatizing weight (eg, using harsh language or stereotypical portrayals of overweight individuals) may impede health promotion efforts, as weight stigma is often negatively related to behavior change and thus seems unlikely to result in weight loss.1 Indeed, considerable research underscores the detrimental effects of weight stigma on the physical health and well-being of children and adolescents,2 and nationally representative, longitudinal data show weight-based discrimination is associated with weight gain among older individuals.3 Although the childhood weight stigma literature frequently examines overt and often malicious behaviors (eg, bullying), stigma processes can begin when an individual experiences weight labeling.4 By labeling someone as overweight, the negative stereotypes, status loss, and mistreatment associated with this label may now be applicable to the individual. Recent research suggests that the negative psychological effects of weight stigma can begin when one is simply labeled as “too fat” by others.5 However, the relationship between weight labeling and weight gain remains unknown. Thus, we examined if weight labeling during childhood was related to the likelihood of having an obese body mass index (BMI) nearly a decade later.

Sample

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study followed up girls who self-identified as black (n = 1213) or white (n = 1166) from age 10 years until age 19 years. Extensive study information is available at https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/static/studies/nghs/Protocol.pdf. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study protocol was approved by institutional review boards at all 3 sites (University of California, Berkeley; University of Cincinnati; and Westat/Group Health Association, Rockville, Maryland). The University of California, Los Angeles Institutional Review Board provided human subjects approval for the current study. The child provided written assent and a parent/guardian provided written informed consent until the child became 18 years old, at which point she provided written informed consent.

Measures

A parent or guardian provided income and education information at baseline. Certified staff conducted anthropometry and collected information on pubertal timing and weight labeling. Weight labeling was assessed by asking participants, “Have any of these people told you that you were too fat?” followed by a list that included father, mother, brother, sister, best girlfriend, boy you like best, any other girl, any other boy, and teacher. Participants reporting “yes” to any item were considered “labeled.”

Participants without BMI data at age 19 years (n = 317) were excluded from analyses. These participants did not differ in baseline BMI, weight labeling, or race but had slightly lower levels of household income and parental education. At baseline, 57.9% (n = 1188) of participants reported being labeled. Black girls reported more weight labeling than white girls (χ21 = 16.13, P < .001), although this difference was small (φ = 0.089). Baseline BMI and weight labeling status were moderately correlated (r = 0.41, P < .001). Logistic regression analyses (Table) evaluated the association between baseline labeling and obesity 10 years later. Adjusting for baseline BMI, household income, parental education, race, and age at menarche, being labeled “too fat” at age 10 years remained a significant predictor of obesity at age 19 years (odds ratio = 1.66). The odds ratio was 1.62 when family members were the source of labeling and 1.40 when nonfamily members were the source. These effects were not modulated by race.

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable.  Results of Logistic Regression Analyses Predicting Obesity Status at Age 19 Years From Baseline Weight Labelinga

Being labeled “too fat” in childhood was associated with higher odds of having an obese BMI nearly a decade later. Importantly, this relationship was independent of initial BMI and thus not attributable simply to participants’ objective weight at baseline. These data provide novel evidence that the relationship between weight stigma and weight gain may begin early in life; these findings also demonstrate that this relationship can emerge even for a seemingly innocuous facet of stigma (ie, labeling). Weight stigma may contribute to weight gain by increasing obesogenic stress processes and triggering weight-promoting coping behaviors like overeating; future research should examine these potential mechanisms.

Given our findings, and the broader literature suggesting weight stigma adversely affects the well-being of overweight children,2 advocating for weight stigma as public health policy seems unproductive.6 Researchers, public health officials, and clinicians should consider nonstigmatizing approaches to improving the health and well-being of overweight children.

Corresponding Author: A. Janet Tomiyama, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, 1285 Franz Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095 (tomiyama@psych.ucla.edu).

Published Online: April 28, 2014. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.122.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Vartanian  LR, Smyth  JM.  Primum non nocere: obesity stigma and public health. J Bioeth Inq. 2013;10(1):49-57.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Puhl  RM, Latner  JD.  Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation’s children. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(4):557-580.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Sutin  AR, Terracciano  A.  Perceived weight discrimination and obesity. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e70048.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Link  BG, Phelan  JC.  Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27(1):363-385. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363.
Link to Article
Mustillo  SA, Budd  K, Hendrix  K.  Obesity, labeling, and psychological distress in late-childhood and adolescent black and white girls: the distal effects of stigma. Soc Psychol Q. 2013;76(3):268-289. doi:10.1177/0190272513495883.
Link to Article
Callahan  D.  Children, stigma, and obesity. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(9):791-792.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Figures

Tables

Table Graphic Jump LocationTable.  Results of Logistic Regression Analyses Predicting Obesity Status at Age 19 Years From Baseline Weight Labelinga

References

Vartanian  LR, Smyth  JM.  Primum non nocere: obesity stigma and public health. J Bioeth Inq. 2013;10(1):49-57.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Puhl  RM, Latner  JD.  Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation’s children. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(4):557-580.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Sutin  AR, Terracciano  A.  Perceived weight discrimination and obesity. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e70048.
PubMed   |  Link to Article
Link  BG, Phelan  JC.  Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27(1):363-385. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363.
Link to Article
Mustillo  SA, Budd  K, Hendrix  K.  Obesity, labeling, and psychological distress in late-childhood and adolescent black and white girls: the distal effects of stigma. Soc Psychol Q. 2013;76(3):268-289. doi:10.1177/0190272513495883.
Link to Article
Callahan  D.  Children, stigma, and obesity. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(9):791-792.
PubMed   |  Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1,395 Views
7 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com


×