We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Methods to Estimate Gestational Age Can Significantly Affect Study Results

Christopher S. Ambrose, MD1; Christopher Rizzo, MD1; Herve Caspard, MD, ScD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1MedImmune, Gaithersburg, Maryland
JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(4):388-390. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5175.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor In their analysis of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) hospitalization risk among preterm infants born at 32 to 34 weeks’ gestational age (GA) with siblings relative to full-term infants with siblings in Florida and Texas, Winterstein et al1 estimated infants’ GA by calculating weeks between the last menstrual period (LMP) date on the birth certificate and the date of birth. Although this method is still used to estimate GA in US natality statistics, it is not widely appreciated that the “clinical estimate” of GA was added to birth certificates in 1989, which was revised to an “obstetric estimate” in 2003.2 The clinical/obstetric estimate is based on multiple prenatal factors such as early prenatal ultrasonography and not solely the LMP.2 Clinical/obstetric GA better reflects the actual GA assigned in clinical care and provides improved accuracy relative to LMP-calculated GA, as evidenced by higher correlations of preterm GA with low birthweight3 and neonatal intensive care unit admission4 (even after adjusting LMP-calculated GA estimates incompatible with birthweight). Hediger and Kiely5 of the National Institutes of Health described the “extensive misclassification of gestational ages at ≤35 weeks based on menstrual dates,” and Qin et al3 of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concluded, “The clinical estimate measure itself, if used appropriately, is the best obstetrical estimate of gestational age.” According to the 1999-2004 US natality public use files, 31.8% and 38.6% of infants with siblings and an LMP-calculated GA of 32 to 34 weeks in Florida and Texas, respectively, were born at 37 to 41 weeks of gestation based on their clinical/obstetric GA. Thus, it appears likely that 30% to 40% of the infants whom Winterstein et al1 identified as 32 to 34 weeks’ GA may have been term infants based on the clinical/obstetric GA recorded on their birth certificates. If these infants experienced an RSV hospitalization risk similar to other term infants, the results from Winterstein et al1 would significantly underestimate the RSV risk among infants with a clinical/obstetric GA of 32 to 34 weeks. Could Winterstein et al provide their results for infants born at 32 to 34 weeks’ GA based on clinical/obstetric GA?


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





April 1, 2014
Almut G. Winterstein, PhD; Caitlin Knox, MPH; Paul Kubilis, MS
1Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville
JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(4):388-389. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5178.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...