We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Review |

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 4 to 8 Years of Children Born at 22 to 25 Weeks’ Gestational Age A Meta-analysis

Gregory P. Moore, MD, FRCPC1,2,3; Brigitte Lemyre, MD, FRCPC1,2,3; Nick Barrowman, PhD4; Thierry Daboval, MD, FRCPC1,2,3
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Newborn Care, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
3Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
4Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(10):967-974. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2395.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  Many centers delivering infants at 22 to 25 weeks’ gestation have limited data regarding their outcomes. A meta-analysis of the 4- to 8-year neurodevelopmental outcomes and exploration of the limitations of meta-analysis would aid physicians and parents to plan care for these infants.

Objectives  To determine the rate of moderate to severe and severe neurodevelopmental impairment by gestational age in extremely preterm survivors followed up between ages 4 and 8 years, as well as to determine whether there is a significant difference in impairment rates between the successive weeks of gestation of survivors.

Evidence Review  A peer-reviewed search strategy obtained English-language publications from MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. Personal files and reference lists from identified articles were searched. Contemporary cohorts were obtained by restriction to those published after 2004. Inclusion criteria were prospective cohort studies, follow-up rate of 65% or more, use of standardized testing or classification for impairment, reporting by gestation, and meeting prespecified definitions of impairment. We excluded randomized clinical trials, highly selective cohorts, consensus statements, and reviews. Of 1771 identified records, 89 full-text publications were assessed for eligibility. Using the full text of each publication, 2 authors independently followed a 2-step procedure. First, they determined that 9 studies met inclusion criteria. Next, they extracted data using a structured data collection form. Investigators were contacted for data clarification.

Results  All extremely preterm infant survivors have a substantial likelihood of developing moderate to severe impairment. Wide confidence intervals at the lower gestations (eg, at 22 weeks, 43% [95% CI, 21%-69%]; heterogeneity I2, 0%) and high heterogeneity at the higher gestations (eg, at 25 weeks, 24% [95% CI, 17%-32%]; I2, 66%) limit the results. There was a statistically significant absolute decrease in moderate to severe impairment between each week of gestation (6.5% [95% CI, 2%-11%]).

Conclusions and Relevance  Knowledge of these data, including the limitations, should facilitate discussion during the shared decision-making process about care plans for these infants, particularly in centers without their own data. More prospective, high-quality, complete cohorts are needed.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.
Flow of Information Through Systematic Review

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were used for selection and screening of data.49

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.
Random-Effects Meta-analysis of Moderate to Severe and Severe Neurodevelopmental Impairment Rates

Data markers indicate mean value; whiskers, 95% CI; and diamonds, pooled estimate (width of the diamond represents the 95% CI).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.
Random-Effects Meta-analysis of the Risk Difference of Neurodevelopmental Impairment for Each Additional Week of Gestational Age (GA)

Data markers indicate mean value; whiskers, 95% CI; and diamonds, pooled estimate (width of the diamond represents the 95% CI).

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

11 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
An Illustration of Bias and Random Error

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
How to Use an Article About Quality Improvement