Original Investigation |

Informing the Uninformed:  Optimizing the Consent Message Using a Fractional Factorial Design

Alan R. Tait, PhD1,5; Terri Voepel-Lewis, MSN, RN1; Vijayan N. Nair, PhD2; Naveen N. Narisetty, MStat2; Angela Fagerlin, PhD3,4,5
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
2Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
3VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
4Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
5The Center for Behavioral and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(7):640-646. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1385.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  Research information should be presented in a manner that promotes understanding. However, many parents and research subjects have difficulty understanding and making informed decisions.

Objective  To examine the effect of different communication strategies on parental understanding of research information.

Design  Observational study from January 2010 to June 2012 using a fractional factorial design.

Setting  Large tertiary care children’s hospital.

Participants  Six hundred forty parents of children scheduled for elective surgery.

Interventions  Parents were randomized to receive information about a hypothetical pain trial presented in 1 of 16 consent documents containing different combinations of 5 selected communication strategies (ie, length, readability, processability [formatting], graphical display, and supplemental verbal disclosure).

Main Outcome and Measures  Parents were interviewed to determine their understanding of the study elements (eg, protocol and alternatives) and their gist (main point) and verbatim (actual) understanding of the risks and benefits.

Results  Main effects for understanding were found for processability, readability, message length, use of graphics, and verbal discussion. Consent documents with high processability, eighth-grade reading level, and graphics resulted in significantly greater gist and verbatim understanding compared with forms without these attributes (mean difference, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.26-0.88, number of correct responses of 7 and mean difference, 0.54; 95% CI,0.20-0.88, number of correct responses of 4 for gist and verbatim, respectively).

Conclusions and Relevance  Results identified several communication strategy combinations that improved parents’ understanding of research information. Adoption of these active strategies by investigators, clinicians, institutional review boards, and study sponsors represents a simple, practical, and inexpensive means to optimize the consent message and enhance parental, participant, and patient understanding.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 1

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles