We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Special Communication |

Missing Data and Multiple Imputation

Peter Cummings, MD, MPH1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Epidemiology and Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle.
JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(7):656-661. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1329.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Missing data can result in biased estimates of the association between an exposure X and an outcome Y. Even in the absence of bias, missing data can hurt precision, resulting in wider confidence intervals. Analysts should examine the missing data pattern and try to determine the causes of the missingness. Modern software has simplified multiple imputation of missing data and the analysis of multiply imputed data to the point where this method should be part of any analyst’s toolkit. Multiple imputation will often, but not always, reduce bias and increase precision compared with complete-case analysis. Some exceptions to this rule are noted in this review. When describing study results, authors should disclose the amount of missing data and other details. Investigators should consider how to minimize missing data when planning a study.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.
Distribution of Risk Ratio Estimates From Complete-Case Analyses (Solid Line) and After Multiple Imputation (Dashed Line) in 2000 Simulations Using Data From Table 1

Data sets were created with data missing at random for 50% of speed data and 20% of seat belt use data among drivers who survived, data missing completely at random for 25% of speed data and 20% of seat belt data among all drivers, and data missing not at random for both seat belt use and death among 30 drivers who used seat belts and died. The true adjusted risk ratio for death among belted vs unbelted drivers was 0.500, shown by a vertical line. The distributions of the risk ratio estimates were smoothed by using a kernel density method.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.
Scatterplot From 2000 Simulations of Table 1 Data

Data for speed were missing completely at random (MCAR) in 25% of the records, and data about seat belt use were MCAR for 20%. Vertical and horizontal lines indicate the true risk ratio of 0.500. The solid diagonal line indicates identical values for both risk ratios, and the dashed diagonal line is from linear regression, with complete-case risk ratios as the explanatory variable and multiple-imputation risk ratios as the outcome. This regression line and the 2000 plotted points both show that the risk ratios produced by multiple imputation are usually closer to 0.500 than those produced by complete-case analysis.

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

19 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Related Collections
PubMed Articles