Article |

Psychological Distress in Parents of Children With Advanced Cancer

Abby R. Rosenberg, MD, MS; Veronica Dussel, MD, MPH; Tammy Kang, MD; J. Russel Geyer, MD; Cynthia A. Gerhardt, PhD; Chris Feudtner, MD, PhD, MPH; Joanne Wolfe, MD, MPH
JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(6):537-543. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.628.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance Parent psychological distress can impact the well-being of childhood cancer patients and other children in the home. Recognizing and alleviating factors of parent distress may improve overall family survivorship experiences following childhood cancer.

Objectives To describe the prevalence and factors of psychological distress (PD) among parents of children with advanced cancer.

Design Cohort study embedded within a randomized clinical trial (Pediatric Quality of Life and Evaluation of Symptoms Technology [PediQUEST] study).

Setting Multicenter study conducted at 3 children's hospitals (Boston Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Seattle Children's Hospital).

Participants Parents of children with advanced (progressive, recurrent, or refractory) cancer.

Main Outcome Measure Parental PD, as measured by the Kessler-6 Psychological Distress Scale.

Results Eighty-six of 104 parents completed the Survey About Caring for Children With Cancer (83% participation); 81 parents had complete Kessler-6 Psychological Distress Scale data. More than 50% of parents reported high PD and 16% met criteria for serious PD (compared with US prevalence of 2%-3%). Parent perceptions of prognosis, goals of therapy, child symptoms/suffering, and financial hardship were associated with PD. In multivariate analyses, average parent Kessler-6 Psychological Distress Scale scores were higher among parents who believed their child was suffering highly and who reported great economic hardship. Conversely, PD was significantly lower among parents whose prognostic understanding was aligned with concrete goals of care.

Conclusions and Relevance Parenting a child with advanced cancer is strongly associated with high to severe levels of PD. Interventions aimed at aligning prognostic understanding with concrete care goals and easing child suffering and financial hardship may mitigate parental PD.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 1. Parent Kessler-6 Psychological Distress Scale (K6) scores stratified by the degree to which child's health affects distress. Distribution of parental distress scores as defined by the K6 among the 79 parents with complete K6 data who also answered the question: “During the last 30 days, to what extent has your child's health contributed to these feelings?” with options “a great deal,” “a lot,” “somewhat,” “a little,” or “not at all” (P < .001 based on Kruskal-Wallis test).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 2. Parent Kessler-6 Psychological Distress Scale (K6) scores associated with perceptions of cure likelihood and corresponding goals of therapy. Distribution of parents' treatment goals according to their understanding of prognosis of their child, with their corresponding mean (SD) K6 scores are presented. *Goals that were concrete and aligned with prognostic understanding. Parents who reported concrete and aligned treatment goals reported lower K6 scores, ie, less distress, than parents who reported other treatment goals. †Two of 33 parents in “likely” or “very likely” group did not report overall goal of medical care. ‡Standard deviation could not be estimated.




Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 1

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics