0
Article | Comparative Effectiveness Research

Cost-effectiveness of Preventive Oral Health Care in Medical Offices for Young Medicaid Enrollees

Sally C. Stearns, PhD; R. Gary Rozier, DDS, MPH; Ashley M. Kranz, BA; Bhavna T. Pahel, BDS, MPH, PhD; Rocio B. Quiñonez, DMD, MS, MPH
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(10):945-951. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.797.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective  To estimate the cost-effectiveness of a medical office–based preventive oral health program in North Carolina called Into the Mouths of Babes (IMB).

Design  Observational study using Medicaid claims data (2000-2006).

Setting  Medical staff delivered IMB services in medical offices, and dentists provided dental services in offices or hospitals.

Participants  A total of 209 285 children enrolled in Medicaid at age 6 months.

Interventions  Into the Mouths of Babes visits included screening, parental counseling, topical fluoride application, and referral to dentists, if needed. The cost-effectiveness analysis used the Medicaid program perspective and a propensity score–matched sample with regression analysis to compare children with 4 or more vs 0 IMB visits.

Main Outcome Measures  Dental treatments and Medicaid payments for children up to age 6 years enabled assessment of the likelihood of whether IMB was cost-saving and, if not, the additional payments per hospital episode avoided.

Results  Into the Mouths of Babes is 32% likely to be cost-saving, with discounting of benefits and payments. On average, IMB visits cost $11 more than reduced dental treatment payments per person. The program almost breaks even if future benefits from prevention are not discounted, and it would be cost-saving with certainty if IMB services could be provided at $34 instead of $55 per visit. The program is cost-effective with 95% certainty if Medicaid is willing to pay $2331 per hospital episode avoided.

Conclusions  Into the Mouths of Babes improves dental health for additional payments that can be weighed against unmeasured hospitalization costs.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 1. The effect of 4 or more Into the Mouths of Babes program visits on the probability of dental services by treatment location, with 95% confidence intervals for hospital use.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 2. Graphs of cost-effectiveness including data for children from ages 6 to 72 months. A, Incremental cost-effectiveness plane (bootstrap estimates from propensity score sample with discounting). B, Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (cost per hospital episode avoided for dental caries) from the propensity score sample with discounting.

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Chapter 22.1. Economic Analysis

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
The Number Needed to Treat in Weighing Benefit and Harm