Pay for performance (P4P)—tying monetary rewards to measures of health care quality—is a payment strategy being embraced by a variety of payers and policy makers nationally and internationally. In this issue of the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, Garner et al1 describe a cluster randomized study of 29 substance abuse treatment sites to examine whether a provider-level piece-rate P4P program was effective at improving adolescent substance abuse treatment structures, processes, and outcomes. This P4P program targeted care related to the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA), an approach to adolescent substance abuse treatment that has been shown to be effective at reducing cannabis use among teens. In the P4P program, therapists could earn $50 for each month that they demonstrated competence with the A-CRA program as judged by digital recordings of their sessions with patients and $200 for each patient who received at least 10 or 12 specific A-CRA “procedures” (eg, asking for description of common [substance abuse] episode, discussing the importance of a satisfying social life, and checking on the progress of treatment goals). Garner et al found that, in adjusted analyses, therapists randomized to the P4P arm of the intervention were significantly more likely to demonstrate A-CRA competence and deliver recommended A-CRA care processes than those in the usual care arm. However, differences in care processes did not necessarily translate into desired changes in outcomes: patients receiving care from treatment centers and therapists in the P4P arm of the study were not any more likely to remain in remission than patients who were not.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Pediatrics editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 3
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
More Listings atJAMACareerCenter.com >
The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
All results at
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.