0
Commentary |

Integrating Methods in the Science of Family Health:  New Directions From an Institute of Medicine Workshop Report

Hirokazu Yoshikawa, PhD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(7):659-661. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.510.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

Families in the United States and worldwide are undergoing rapid changes owing to large-scale social and economic trends. Demographic shifts, economic upheavals, changing societal norms and values, and both immigration across national borders and migration within nations are creating new and altered structures, processes, and relationships within families. In response to these changes in the contexts and nature of the family, the science of research on families is on the brink of a new and exciting integration of methods, disciplines, and epistemological perspectives. The methods used to study families are becoming more wide ranging, and both senior and junior scientists are combining approaches from a variety of disciplines. No single research methodology can master the complexity of the family. Demographic data are invaluable but can be limited by a lack of understanding of new family processes. Qualitative data can provide an essential complement to quantitative data but can be limited in estimating large-scale patterns. Assessment of physiological, biological, and epigenetic processes is increasingly being integrated into family research, but these multidisciplinary and multimethod studies often require greater emphasis on team building and long-term approaches. A strong interest in better understanding how scientific research on the family can be used to improve the health and well-being of children has spawned a large and growing body of data from various disciplines. The new science of family research cuts across many disciplines: demography, anthropology, psychology, sociology, economics, education, genetics, neuroscience, and developmental biology. Researchers from these fields use case studies, ethnographies, longitudinal studies, diary and time use records, assessments, administrative records, biological and genetic assessments, and many other methodologies. The results are theories and hypotheses that reflect many different disciplinary perspectives.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs