We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Commentary |

Classics in Pediatrics The Smallest Preterm Infants: Reasons for Optimism and New Dilemmas

Jeffrey P. Baker, MD, PhD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(8):689-691. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.116.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


When Arthur Kopelman1 published his commentary, “The Smallest Preterm Infants: Reasons for Optimism and New Dilemmas,” in the American Journal of Diseases of Children in 1978, neonatology was approaching a tipping point in the United States. Prior to the 1960s, most hospitals had little to offer preterm babies beyond incubators and good nursing care. Premature baby nurseries were backwaters of the hospital, dominated by nurses rather than physicians.2 This “hands-off” era came to an end when the routine use of high-oxygen incubators in the 1950s led to the greatest iatrogenic disaster ever to befall neonatal medicine: the blinding of more than 10 000 infants from retinopathy of prematurity.3 Physicians began to play a more active role in caring for premature infants and studying their physiology. Among many examples, Mary Ellen Avery and Jere Mead4 showed that the respiratory distress syndrome of premature infants resulted from a deficiency of surfactant in the lung. Despite such insights, the outlook for small premature infants remained bleak well into the 1960s. In 1963, Patrick Bouvier Kennedy, the president's son, died of respiratory distress syndrome in a tiny hyperbaric chamber at Children's Medical Center at Boston.5

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

2 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections